# Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback

> Source: <https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.32032>
> Published: 2026-07-01 05:34:21+00:00

# Computer Science > Computation and Language

[Submitted on 30 Jun 2026]

# Title:Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs

[View PDF](/pdf/2606.32032)

[HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2606.32032v1)

Abstract:Metacognition is a critical component of intelligence that describes the ability to monitor and regulate one's own cognitive processes. Yet LLMs exhibit systemic deficiencies in key metacognitive faculties: they hallucinate with high confidence, fail to recognize knowledge boundaries, and misrepresent their internal uncertainty--undermining trustworthiness and reliability. Since monitoring task performance and adapting behavior accordingly are central to metacognition, we posit that models capable of accurately judging their own performance are better positioned to improve it. We operationalize this idea via two novel mechanisms: reinforcement learning with metacognitive feedback (RLMF), a paradigm to refine completion rankings during preference optimization based on the quality of a model's self-judgments of performance, and metacognitive data selection, which uses similar self-judgments to identify high-value training examples, outperforming naive active learning. We apply these innovations to the problem of faithful calibration (FC), a task that is itself fundamentally metacognitive: the goal is to align expressed with intrinsic uncertainty, difficult even for frontier LLMs. We adopt a two-stage, decoupled approach, first using these methods to calibrate the faithfulness of models' self-reported confidence scores, then mapping to natural, context-adaptable linguistic uncertainty via targeted output editing. Extensive experiments show RLMF achieves generalizable, state-of-the-art FC on diverse tasks while preserving accuracy. Further, RLMF surpasses standard RL by up to 63% while enhancing models' ability to assess and express their own capability limits. This positions RLMF as a promising paradigm to enhance LLM metacognition toward improved abilities and alignment, and suggests metacognitive performance as an effective RL signal to overcome limits of prior intrinsic feedback methods.

### References & Citations

Loading...

# Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer

*(*[What is the Explorer?](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/showcase.html#arxiv-bibliographic-explorer))
Connected Papers

*(*[What is Connected Papers?](https://www.connectedpapers.com/about))
Litmaps

*(*[What is Litmaps?](https://www.litmaps.co/))
scite Smart Citations

*(*[What are Smart Citations?](https://www.scite.ai/))# Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv

*(*[What is alphaXiv?](https://alphaxiv.org/))
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers

*(*[What is CatalyzeX?](https://www.catalyzex.com))
DagsHub

*(*[What is DagsHub?](https://dagshub.com/))
Gotit.pub

*(*[What is GotitPub?](http://gotit.pub/faq))
Hugging Face

*(*[What is Huggingface?](https://huggingface.co/huggingface))
ScienceCast

*(*[What is ScienceCast?](https://sciencecast.org/welcome))# Demos

# Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower

*(*[What are Influence Flowers?](https://influencemap.cmlab.dev/))
CORE Recommender

*(*[What is CORE?](https://core.ac.uk/services/recommender))# arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? [ Learn more about arXivLabs](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html).
