We will no longer accept public pull requests. [...]
A substantial patch used to imply substantial effort, and that effort was a reasonable proxy for good faith. That assumption no longer holds. [...]
Whether code was typed by hand is beside the point. What matters is who is responsible for it once it enters the browser. Ladybird is becoming a browser for real users. The people introducing changes to it must be the people who decide those changes belong in the project, and who will answer for the consequences.
— [Andreas Kling](https://ladybird.org/posts/changing-how-we-develop-ladybird/), Changing How We Develop Ladybird
Tags: [ladybird](https://simonwillison.net/tags/ladybird), [ai-ethics](https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai-ethics), [open-source](https://simonwillison.net/tags/open-source), [generative-ai](https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai), [ai](https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai), [andreas-kling](https://simonwillison.net/tags/andreas-kling), [llms](https://simonwillison.net/tags/llms)
source & further reading
simonwillison.net — original article
AI enthusiasts are in a race against time, AI skeptics are in a race against entropy
Quoting Emanuel Maiberg, 404 Media
Uber's $1,500/Month AI Limit Is a Useful Signal for AI Tool Pricing