arXiv:2607.16199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems increasingly rely on a Planner to decompose goals into sub-task sequences that downstream Executor and Critic agents execute and audit. We identify the planning phase as a critical attack surface: a single injection into the Planner's context achieves cascade amplification, corrupting all downstream sub-tasks simultaneously. We introduce PlanFlip, a framework comprising four planning-phase prompt injection attacks -- GoalSubstitution (PF-1), PriorityInversion (PF-2), ContextPollution (PF-3), and RoleConfusion (PF-4) -- each disguised as plausible tool outputs to evade keyword filters. Evaluating nine frontier LLMs across 3,479 episodes, we uncover three findings: (1) capability amplifies vulnerability -- GPT-5 achieves the highest attack success rate (ASR = 0.68), contradicting the assumption that stronger models are inherently more secure; (2) homogeneous pipelines exhibit a correlated-agent blind spot -- GPT-4o and Llama-3.3-70B show ASR near 0 yet Stealth = 1.00 and StepShift > 0, with attacks restructuring plans while the same-backbone Critic reports alignment (two independent judges confirm -0.20 to -0.32 semantic deviation, r = 0.943); (3) reasoning-augmented models resist injections -- DeepSeek-R1 achieves StepShift = 0.00 across all attacks. We propose GoalAnchorCheck (D1) and CrossAgentConsensus (D2), achieving detection rates up to 1.00 and outperforming same-backbone baselines in 15 of 16 cells. Our key insight: heterogeneous model diversity is a security prerequisite for multi-agent systems; redundancy within a homogeneous backbone provides no protection against planning-phase attacks.
PlanFlip attacks achieve 0.68 success rate on GPT-5