I have released Paper 4 in the ADI Research Series: Behavioral Governance of Artificial Workers: Evaluating Completed Work Under Declared Authority and Behavioral Requirements.
The paper asks a narrower systems question than whether an AI worker can finish a task: can a completed output also be evaluated against declared authority, scope, and behavioral requirements before it is released?
The model may generate a proposed completion. External controls decide whether that completion meets the stated acceptance contract. This is a bounded evaluation claim for the tested setting—not a claim of universal safety, deterministic language generation, or general intelligence equivalence.
Public preprint and DOI: Behavioral Governance of Artificial Workers: Evaluating Completed Work Under Declared Authority and Behavioral Requirements | Zenodo I welcome critique of the stated methods, acceptance boundary, and limitations.