cd /news/machine-learning/openjev-rlcd-a-working-rlcd-implemen… · home › topics › machine-learning › article
[ARTICLE · art-143014] src=machinebrief.com ↗ pub= topic=machine-learning verified=true sentiment=· neutral

OpenJev-RLCD: A Working RLCD Implementation

A working implementation of reinforcement learning for calibrated decisions (RLCD) for reasoning models, OpenJev-RLCD, matches or beats supervised fine-tuning, RFT/STaR and GRPO in accuracy and beats all of them in selective prediction, according to an arXiv paper (2609.38850v1) whose code is posted at github.com/ZimmyGao/openjev-rlcd. With Qwen3-1.7B across two reasoning tasks and 3 seeds with paired tests, a single query on GSM8K answer verification decides 25% of items at 5% error or less, versus 5% for GRPO. The paper's two-stage recipe — calibrate, then reinforce — scores the answer distribution a model commits to after sampling a rationale with a strictly proper scoring rule, and shows RLVR is that mixture objective without its diversity term.

by read1 min views1 publishedOct 1, 2026

arXiv:2609.38850v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision models such as Jev answer questions with probabilities, which are only useful if they are calibrated. Open-source reproductions rely on supervised fine-tuning plus temperature scaling, while reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) makes reasoning models overconfident. We present a working implementation of reinforcement learning for calibrated decisions (RLCD) for reasoning models: the model samples a rationale, and we score the answer distribution it commits to afterwards with a strictly proper scoring rule. A variance identity shows that scoring the mixture of several samples rewards disagreeing rationales, and that RLVR is exactly this mixture objective without its diversity term. Optimized naively, the per-rationale objective either switches reasoning off or is drowned out by policy-gradient noise, which leads to a two-stage recipe: calibrate, then reinforce. With Qwen3-1.7B on two reasoning tasks (3 seeds, paired tests), RLCD matches or beats SFT, RFT/STaR and GRPO (each temperature-scaled) in accuracy and beats all of them in selective prediction; on GSM8K answer verification a single query decides \gvTwoCovFive% of the items at $\le$5% error, versus \gvGrpoCovFive% for GRPO. When uncertainty comes from annotator disagreement, RLCD provably cannot beat cross-entropy. Code and results: https://github.com/ZimmyGao/openjev-rlcd.

── more in #machine-learning 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @openjev-rlcd 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/openjev-rlcd-a-worki…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-10-01 · —