{"slug": "openai-fixed-a-visibility-problem-the-governance-problem-remains", "title": "OpenAI fixed a visibility problem; the governance problem remains.", "summary": "OpenAI introduced a new ChatGPT security feature called Active sessions, allowing users to review and log out of individual or all active sessions across devices, now available for all account types. The feature addresses long-standing enterprise governance gaps by providing administrators with visibility into device, location, and session details, though experts note it remains basic and excludes SSO-linked accounts, connected apps, and third-party sessions. With 1 billion monthly active users, the update aims to improve accountability and reduce unauthorized access risks, but governance challenges persist as model iterations continue to outpace security frameworks.", "body_md": "AI governance is an ongoing game of catch-up for enterprises. Model updates and iterations are rolling out at a rapid clip, often making governance frameworks obsolete before they’re battle-tested.\n\nTo evolve beyond this paradigm, OpenAI is introducing [Active sessions](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes#active-account-session-controls). This new ChatGPT security feature allows users to review and log out of one or more sessions through a simple interface. The feature is now available across all ChatGPT accounts and workspace types, including personal and managed workspaces. Experts call it an important development for the model provider, which currently has [1 billion monthly active users](https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-app-hits-1-billion-monthly-active-users-record-time-data-shows-2026-06-02/).\n\nPreviously, organizations often had limited visibility into where users were logged in, and simply relied on password resets or broad account actions to force re-authentication, noted [Ensar Seker](https://www.sans.org/profiles/ensar-seker), CISO at SOCRadar. “Granular session control is a more efficient and less disruptive approach. From a governance perspective, session transparency improves accountability and supports investigations,” he explained.\n\nActive sessions allows admins to see known browser and app sessions across ChatGPT, Codex, and API Platform. Specifically, they are able to view device and browser information, approximate location, sign-in date and time, whether a device is trusted, and whether the session is current.\n\nTo access the feature, users can go to ‘Settings’ > ‘Security’ > ‘Active sessions.’ They can then log out of specific sessions and remove devices from trusted services. They also have the ability to log out of all sessions (thus ending sessions across devices), however, this action can take up to 30 minutes to complete.\n\nHowever, OpenAI emphasizes that session details may be “approximate or incomplete,” and that the feature has limits. It does not show or manage connected apps or third-party app sessions, sign-ins through third-party services, [Codex CLI sessions](https://www.csoonline.com/article/4179815/attack-targeting-openai-codex-users-exposes-ai-software-supply-chain-risks.html), or recently signed-out sessions.\n\nFurther, Active sessions cannot be used with accounts linked to an enterprise’s single sign-on (SSO), including security assertion markup language (SAML) and OpenID Connect (OIDC).\n\nWhile Active sessions is an important security and governance development, experts note that the feature is basic, and was a long time coming.\n\n“The reality of OpenAI offering the ability to end active sessions on ChatGPT by administrators is that it’s something that exists in lots of platforms,” said [David Shipley](https://www.linkedin.com/in/dbshipley/) of Beauceron Security. “They should’ve had it sooner, but better late than never.”\n\nFrom a [security standpoint](https://www.csoonline.com/article/4179644/7-tabletop-exercise-mistakes-that-sabotage-incident-response.html), he noted, OpenAI could do a better job policing ChatGPT to prevent it being used by threat actors to host malware, which is the latest threat to enterprises.\n\nSOCRadar’s Seker also pointed out that this type of visibility and oversight is something that enterprises have expected from SaaS platforms for years. “It allows administrators and users to quickly identify unauthorized access, terminate stale sessions, and reduce the risk of account compromise persisting undetected.”\n\nLast week, OpenAI [updated GPT-5.5 Instant](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes#gpt-55-instant-update) in both the ChatGPT app and API to “improve response style and quality,” the company said. It had rolled out GPT-5.5 Instant earlier in May as a successor to GPT‑5.3 Instant, calling it “generally smarter” and prone to fewer hallucinations.\n\nAccording to OpenAI, the update makes GPT-5.5 Instant “easier to read, more natural in everyday conversations, and better paced in practical help tasks, with fewer overly long or bullet-heavy responses.”\n\nBut even with tools like Active sessions, enterprises continue to struggle with governance amidst seemingly continuous iterative model updates. It’s simply not sustainable, said Beauceron’s Shipley: “How do you build an appropriate testing plan with a nondeterministic system?”\n\nSOCRadar’s Seker pointed out that many organizations perform security, compliance, and business validation testing before approving a model for production use. But, “when model behavior changes under the same version family, previously documented assumptions may no longer fully reflect actual performance,” he noted.\n\n“The biggest governance challenge in AI is not model adoption, it’s model change,” Seker said. “Most organizations can evaluate a model once. Far fewer are prepared to continuously evaluate how that model evolves over time.”\n\nThis particularly creates challenges for regulated industries where auditability, repeatability, and change management are critical, he said. Even beneficial improvements can introduce governance concerns if organizations are not clearly informed about what changed and when.\n\n[Valence Howden](https://www.infotech.com/profiles/valence-howden), advisory fellow at Info-Tech Research Group, noted that organizations often can’t assess the implications of model iterations against their boundaries, and, worse, are often unaware of them.\n\nWhile the biggest enterprise challenge was initially tied to which AI model was being used, what that model did, and who owned it, iterative updates can muddy those waters and increase reliance on third party practices and tools that organizations often don’t have the resources for, he noted.\n\n“Without the ability to opt out [of an update] before it’s incorporated, [enterprises] are basically red-teaming the updates with their clients,” said Howden.\n\nSecurity teams today are pushed to their limits because they are expected to manage rapidly evolving models, new features, and changing behaviors, while maintaining compliance, risk management, and business continuity, said SOCRadar’s Seker.\n\n“Governance is difficult because organizations are no longer evaluating a static product,” he said. Rather, they are managing a “continuously evolving service” where capabilities, integrations, and user behaviors can change far faster than can traditional security review cycles.\n\nInfo-Tech’s Howden agreed, saying that enterprises’ existing governance practices, especially accountability, are poor, as are their risk practices.\n\n“It’s hard to suddenly become good at things they’re already poor at doing,” he said. “They are also incentivized for speed and innovation, so they ignore governance as a constraint, or don’t want to do it at all.”\n\nSeker advised that, ultimately, organizations should treat AI models as living systems rather than fixed software releases.\n\nSecurity and governance programs should include continuous validation, monitoring, and periodic re-assessment instead of sole reliance on one-time approval processes, he said. Enterprises should also establish clear vendor change management expectations, including requiring transparency around model updates, behavioral changes, and potential impacts to existing workflows.\n\n“Effective AI governance increasingly depends on visibility into change, not just visibility into risk,” Seker said.", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/openai-fixed-a-visibility-problem-the-governance-problem-remains", "canonical_source": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/4181004/openai-fixed-a-visibility-problem-the-governance-problem-remains.html", "published_at": "2026-06-04 02:32:05+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-06-04 02:50:13.707939+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-safety", "ai-policy", "ai-products", "large-language-models"], "entities": ["OpenAI", "ChatGPT", "Ensar Seker", "SOCRadar", "Codex", "API Platform"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/openai-fixed-a-visibility-problem-the-governance-problem-remains", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/openai-fixed-a-visibility-problem-the-governance-problem-remains.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/openai-fixed-a-visibility-problem-the-governance-problem-remains.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/openai-fixed-a-visibility-problem-the-governance-problem-remains.jsonld"}}