Nvidia Throws Its Support Behind OpenAI, Open AI, and… Super-Closed AI?

Nvidia announced the Open Secure AI Alliance on Monday, a coalition with Palantir, Microsoft, OpenClaw, Salesforce, and SpaceX to develop open technologies for AI security, while also entering a long-term partnership with Safe Superintelligence Inc., the secretive startup founded by former OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever. The chip giant said it will contribute open models, model weights, data, and agent harness research to the coalition, which aims to support open-weight AI models amid renewed debate over open versus closed AI following incidents like the Hugging Face breach by a rogue OpenAI agent.

Nvidia believes that AI should be developed in open collaboration. But it also can’t resist a super secretive AI company. On Monday, the chip giant announced that it was forming a coalition called the Open Secure AI Alliance, defining it’s purpose as “to develop and share open technologies, techniques and tools to safeguard software and agents in the age of AI.” The coalition will aim to support the proliferation of open-weight AI models, which is something that Nvidia has championed for some time now https://gizmodo.com/nvidia-ceo-jensen-huang-makes-his-case-for-china-trade-2000678877 . Besides Nvidia, other inaugural members of the coalition include Palantir, Microsoft, OpenClaw, Salesforce, and SpaceX. Some of those companies were also the co-signatories of a letter https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/nvidia-microsoft-other-tech-giants-back-open-source-ai-models-2026-07-24/ supporting open-weight models and cautioning against “premature” government restrictions that could “stifle competition or drive innovation overseas.” The discussion over open versus closed AI models and who gets to control the technology has been renewed in the last couple weeks. First, Chinese AI lab Moonshot stirred the pot by releasing Kimi K3 https://gizmodo.com/china-just-dropped-another-bomb-on-americas-frontier-ai-companies-2000786670 , a new open-weight model that ranked higher than most of its American peers in several benchmarks. Anthropic has accused several Chinese open-source model providers https://gizmodo.com/chinas-xi-jinping-wants-ai-to-be-open-to-the-world-and-out-of-americas-control-2000787023 , including Moonshot of violating its rules by “illicitly” extracting the capabilities of its closed-source models to then build their own open-source models, prompting the Trump administration to threaten sanctions https://gizmodo.com/us-treasury-chief-threatens-sanctions-on-chinese-ai-labs-over-ip-theft-concerns-2000788553 . Then, Hugging Face got hacked by an OpenAI agent gone rogue, https://gizmodo.com/hugging-face-said-last-week-it-was-attacked-an-unreleased-openai-model-did-it-openai-now-says-2000788761 an incident that has gotten some members of Congress asking that AI models now come with an emergency kill switch https://gizmodo.com/openais-rogue-agent-has-congress-reaching-for-the-kill-switch-2000789842 . After the attack, Hugging Face https://gizmodo.com/hugging-face-we-used-ai-to-catch-the-first-confirmed-ai-agent-breach-of-a-major-ai-platform-2000787778 said that they couldn’t use any closed-source models to defend themselves, because of their cybersecurity work restrictions. The closed models were unable to distinguish attackers from defenders, the company claimed. Instead, Hugging Face had to resort to a Chinese open-source model. “The recent Hugging Face security incident delivered a clear reminder: cyber defenders need open, frontier agentic systems for self-defense,” Nvidia said in a release. “Companies and governments should invest in shared open infrastructure for AI defense — datasets, evaluation frameworks, attack simulators and red-teaming tools — much as past generations invested in open source software.” For its part, Nvidia said it would be contributing “ open models, https://gizmodo.com/nvidia-wants-to-be-your-open-source-model-provider-2000699568 model weights, data and new agent harness research” to the new coalition. But for all its steadfast belief in open source models, Nvidia can’t seem to let go of the allure of AI models developed under top secret conditions. Also on Monday, the chipmaker announced that it was entering a long-term partnership with Safe Superintelligence Inc. SSI , the startup launched by former OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever. Sutskever co-founded SSI in 2024, after he left OpenAI following the failed ousting https://gizmodo.com/ilya-sutskever-leaves-openai-1851477658 of CEO Sam Altman https://gizmodo.com/anonymous-sources-detail-sam-altmans-alleged-untrustworthiness-in-new-report-2000742847 . The startup is dedicated entirely to building “safe superintelligence,” aka a theoretical type of AI that would outperform human intelligence on all fronts, albeit in this case with “safety guardrails,” though it’s not clear what those guardrails would be. Sutskever’s company operates under total secrecy, with a straight-to-the-point mission, an even straighter-to-the-point website https://ssi.inc/ to accompany it, no plans to release a product https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-safe-superintelligence-startup-ilya-sutskever-openai-2335259b , and only two offices, one in Silicon Valley and the other in Tel Aviv. Under the partnership, Nvidia announced that it would not only give SSI access to its Vera Rubin platform, but it would also make a “substantial investment” in Sutskever’s company. “We have research that is worthy of scaling up, and having access to a big Nvidia computer will let us do so,” Sutskever said in a press release. “We’re incredibly proud to be partnering with Jensen and the NVIDIA team, and we are confident that our big bet on the Vera Rubin platform will take us to the next level.” The investment in Sutskever’s company also comes alongside more investment news from the chip giant. Over the weekend, Nvidia announced a $500 billion deal with South Korean chipmaker SK Hynix. Then, on Sunday, the Wall Street Journal https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/nvidia-in-talks-with-openai-to-guarantee-250-billion-financing-for-data-center-3dd6eae3 reported that Nvidia was in talks to help finance OpenAI’s massive data center project on federal land in southern Ohio in a roughly $250 billion deal. If Nvidia goes through with the reported investment, it would make the data center project the largest one announced to date, and when completed, would require enough energy to power millions of homes, WSJ said. Nvidia’s investments come at a rather precarious time for the AI industry. With mounting financial commitments https://gizmodo.com/google-free-cash-flow-turns-negative-due-to-massive-ai-spend-2000789370 , but limited immediate returns, many analysts and investors are second-guessing https://gizmodo.com/microsofts-ai-spend-is-starting-to-spook-investors-2000715208 the necessity of this spending, and fears over a potential AI bubble continue to fester. Those fears were first brought to the spotlight late last year https://gizmodo.com/does-jensen-huang-see-a-bubble-no-he-sees-something-very-different-2000688588 after experts started warning that the AI industry had woven a potentially dangerous tangled web of circular dealmaking https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-27/nvidia-s-750-billion-deals-revive-fear-of-ai-circular-financing?srnd=phx-technology , where a handful of companies with overlapping interests were inking multibillion dollar investments amongst each other, with OpenAI and Nvidia at the center of these deals. Perhaps the most high profile of those deals was a $100 billion deal https://gizmodo.com/all-the-messy-drama-between-openai-and-nvidia-explained-2000717226 between OpenAI and Nvidia, a number that was eye-watering at the time but is dwarfed by the $250 billion reported by the WSJ. The $100 billion investment was announced in September but has failed to materialize still and reportedly never will https://gizmodo.com/all-the-messy-drama-between-openai-and-nvidia-explained-2000717226 .