{"slug": "newsom-orders-california-to-keep-calling-it-ai-and-bans-bosses-from-firing-by", "title": "Newsom orders California to keep calling it “AI”, and bans bosses from firing workers by algorithm", "summary": "California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order N-10-26 on Wednesday directing state agencies to keep using the terms \"Artificial Intelligence\" and \"AI\" regardless of the federal government's terminology, one day after President Trump ordered Washington to say \"Super Intelligence\" instead. Newsom signed the order alongside 13 new AI laws, including SB 947, the No Robo Bosses Act by Senator Jerry McNerney, which from July 1, 2027 bars California employers from relying solely on an automated decision system to discipline or fire workers, with fines of $500 per violation enforced by the state labour commissioner or public prosecutors. A second law, SB 951, requires mass-layoff notices to state when AI or automation caused the job losses \"in whole or in substantial part,\" and the state employment department must report to lawmakers by January 2028 on how AI is changing hiring.", "body_md": "Gavin Newsom signing housing bills with California lawmakers in October 2019 (file photo). Image: [Office of the Governor of California](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gavin_Newsom_signing_bills_on_Oct_10_2019_02.jpg) / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain, cropped\n\nCalifornia will keep calling it AI. Governor Gavin Newsom [signed an executive order](https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/SIGNED_EO-N-10-26_9.30.26.pdf) on Wednesday telling state agencies to go on saying “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI”, whatever the federal government calls it, a day after President Trump ordered Washington to say “Super Intelligence” instead. He signed it alongside [13 new AI laws](https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/30/californias-nation-leading-ai-framework-just-got-stronger-governor-newsom-signs-more-first-in-the-nation-worker-protections-and-more/), including a ban on employers firing or disciplining workers on the say-so of an algorithm alone.\n\n## “A person of normal intelligence”\n\nThe order, numbered N-10-26, is a direct answer to Trump’s [“Super Intelligence” order](https://madrobot.blog/2026/09/29/trump-executive-order-super-intelligence-si-replaces-ai-federal-government/). Its preamble does not hold back:\n\nWhile language and choice of terminology can have significance, purporting to change something’s name cannot distract a person of normal intelligence from recognizing the impotent and craven failure to take action to address well-documented emerging security and safety risks posed by that thing.\n\nExecutive Order N-10-26, signed by Gavin Newsom\n\nIt tells every agency under Newsom’s authority to use “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” “notwithstanding any rebranded or different terminology used by the federal government”. The governor’s office headlined the announcement “Signs executive order declaring the obvious”. “Super intelligence is clearly not coming from the White House,” Newsom said, adding: “that’s why California continues to lead.”\n\n## No firing by algorithm\n\nThe biggest of the new laws is [SB 947](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB947), the No Robo Bosses Act, by Senator Jerry McNerney. From July 1, 2027, employers in California may not rely solely on an automated decision system, which the law defines to include AI, when they discipline or fire someone.\n\nIf a company relies primarily on an AI system’s output, a human has to check the decision against other evidence, such as manager evaluations, personnel files, the worker’s own output or peer reviews. If the human can’t back it up, or finds the AI’s output inaccurate or misleading, the company can’t use it. The worker must get a plain-language notice saying AI was used and that a human reviewed it, plus a named person to contact and the right to see a description of their own data the system used.\n\nEmployers also can’t use these systems to work out a worker’s protected status, such as race or religion, or to predict and punish people for using their legal rights. Fines are $500 per violation, enforced by the state labour commissioner or public prosecutors. There is no right for workers to sue on their own.\n\nNewsom vetoed an earlier version of the bill last October. This one is narrower: it drops the rules on predicting worker behaviour and replaces a right to 12 months of data with a description of the data used.\n\n## Layoff notices must name the AI\n\nA second law, [SB 951](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB951), updates California’s mass-layoff notice rules. When a layoff, relocation or closure is caused “in whole or in substantial part” by AI or other automation replacing jobs, the employer’s notice must say so, including which job functions are being automated. The state employment department will publish a quarterly summary of these AI job losses and report to lawmakers by January 2028 on how AI is changing hiring.\n\nThe other bills ban workplace surveillance tools in bathrooms, stop lawyers handing core legal work such as drafting briefs entirely to AI, let doctors use their own judgment when clinical AI tools are involved, tighten the state’s AI watermarking law and require gene synthesis companies to check who their customers are.\n\nLorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, said:\n\nBy signing these four first-in-the-nation bills, Governor Newsom has shown the country how we can begin to put guardrails on AI at work to ensure human oversight over this technology, limit surveillance, and put workers first.\n\nLorena Gonzalez, California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO\n\n## Why it matters\n\nCalifornia is where most big AI companies are based, so its rules reach far beyond the state, and this is the first US law to stop AI alone from deciding who gets fired. It also widens the split with Washington, where the White House is relying on a [voluntary pact](https://madrobot.blog/2026/09/29/trump-ai-leaders-sign-morally-binding-self-regulation-accord-white-house-lunch/) with AI companies and Senator Ted Cruz has [blocked binding federal safety rules](https://madrobot.blog/2026/09/30/ted-cruz-blocks-senate-ai-risk-management-security-act-warner-schatz-kim/).\n\n*Sources: [Office of the Governor of California](https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/30/californias-nation-leading-ai-framework-just-got-stronger-governor-newsom-signs-more-first-in-the-nation-worker-protections-and-more/), [Executive Order N-10-26](https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/SIGNED_EO-N-10-26_9.30.26.pdf), [SB 947 text](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB947), [SB 951 text](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB951) (September 30, 2026)*", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/newsom-orders-california-to-keep-calling-it-ai-and-bans-bosses-from-firing-by", "canonical_source": "https://madrobot.blog/2026/10/01/newsom-california-keeps-calling-it-ai-no-robo-bosses-act-sb-947/", "published_at": "2026-10-01 00:52:00+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-10-01 01:18:37.747743+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-policy", "artificial-intelligence", "ai-ethics"], "entities": ["Gavin Newsom", "California", "Donald Trump", "Executive Order N-10-26", "SB 947", "No Robo Bosses Act", "Jerry McNerney", "SB 951"], "also_reported_by": [], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/newsom-orders-california-to-keep-calling-it-ai-and-bans-bosses-from-firing-by", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/newsom-orders-california-to-keep-calling-it-ai-and-bans-bosses-from-firing-by.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/newsom-orders-california-to-keep-calling-it-ai-and-bans-bosses-from-firing-by.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/newsom-orders-california-to-keep-calling-it-ai-and-bans-bosses-from-firing-by.jsonld"}}