# New Google Networks Tuned Up For GenAI Inference And Training > Source: > Published: 2026-04-28 16:53:56+00:00 connect # New Google Networks Tuned Up For GenAI Inference And Training It is almost certainly not a coincidence that a networking expert at Google has risen to the top to be put in charge of the infrastructure development at the search engine, advertising, and now AI model giant. This is particularly true given that Google has also almost certainly developed the kind of disaggregated datacenter infrastructure that we have been banging on about for more than a decade at The Next Platform. In such a disaggregated and composable world, [networking is always in the middle of everything](https://www.nextplatform.com/connect/2025/08/21/google-is-already-using-the-future-ai-network-you-might-get-in-2028/100911), and there is always a need to have a network that is not just tuned up, but created to do a specific job or set of jobs so well that it warrants a different network in the first place. This is particularly true where the components of what would have been a standalone system are broken apart and trayed up in racks that allow for virtual systems of varying configurations of compute/memory, I/O, accelerators, and storage, running from a mix of small systems doing a lot of jobs to one big cluster doing one big job as necessary. It is not just as simple as putting a bunch of PCI-Express switches in the racks and trays of compute/memory, I/O, and storage in the same racks. The proliferation of networks and protocols continues across classically distributed computing and storage, spanning a datacenter, and expands outwards to connectivity across datacenter regions and around the globe. Here are but a few examples. Google revealed its homegrown, Linux-based [network operating system, called Snap, and its companion Pony Express data plane engine](https://research.google/pubs/snap-a-microkernel-approach-to-host-networking/) in 2019 and has been using this in production since around 2016. Four years ago, Google revealed that it had created [the Aquila protocol to give InfiniBand-style low latency](https://www.nextplatform.com/2022/04/12/with-aquila-google-abandons-ethernet-to-outdo-infiniband/) for relatively small, tightly coupled clusters as well as a companion Top of Rack in Network Interface Card, or TiN chip to implement a custom network for clusters that have 1,000 nodes linked in a dragonfly all-to-all topology. And then there is [the Falcon low latency network interface transport](https://www.nextplatform.com/connect/2025/08/21/google-is-already-using-the-future-ai-network-you-might-get-in-2028/100911) for the “Mount Evans” DPUs that Google designed in conjunction with Intel. As part of [the recent TPU 8 announcements last week](https://www.nextplatform.com/compute/2026/04/24/with-tpu-8-google-makes-genai-systems-much-better-not-just-bigger/5218834), where Google announced a TPU 8i tailored for inference and a TPU 8t aimed at training, I said we would circle back and take a look at the new Boardfly configuration of the Inter-Chip Interconnect that Google invented to cluster together its TPU AI compute engines with a certain amount – and we are not sure to what level – of memory coherency across those compute engines. I also wanted to dig into the new “Virgo” scale out, datacenter-scale Ethernet fabric that Google has created for linking together racks of machinery, including but not limited to TPU pods. Up until now, as you can see in the monster table I originally published in the TPU 8 compute engine story and I am reprinting below for the sake of convenience, the prior generations of TPU clusters made use of a 2D torus or, for very large scale machines with thousands of TPUs in a compute pod, a 3D torus interconnect. Take a gander: The torus topology has multiple dimensions, as the name suggests, and have been popular in some supercomputer architectures – IBM’s BlueGene massively parallel machines used a 3D torus and the “K” and “Fugaku” supercomputers built by Fujitsu have a 6D “Tofu” interconnect, just to give two examples. The torus is great for hooking a lot of gear together, but it is very hard to add new machines to it. The 2D torus runs out at 256 accelerators, and with the 3D torus Google used with the “Ironwood” TPU v7e, the connectivity limit pushed as far as 9,216 accelerators. With the new “Sunfish” TPU 8t training cluster, that limit has been stretched to 9,600 TPUs in a single system image linked by the 3D torus. The torus topology is good for distributed processing, but there are a lot of hops between devices and that means the latency is high because of the jumps. This is fine for training, but it is not fine when it comes to inference, where the one and only goal is to drive down the cost of inference. Inference has a lot of all-reduce and all-to-all communication, particularly the mixture of experts (MoE) reasoning models that dominate the licensed models and API services we see out there in the world. That is why the “Zebrafish” TPU 8i is getting the new Boardfly topology, which can scale to 1,152 interconnected TPU 8i devices in a single memory and compute space and drop the number of hops down from 16 with the 3D torus of similar capacity to 7 with the Boardfly configuration. This means that the new Boardfly topology – inspired by dragonfly topologies that have become more common in supercomputing over the past decade and a half – Google is able to push that ICI network scale for inference up pretty high while dropping the network diameter by 56 percent and therefore drives the tail latency of data movement down even more. On average, Google says, the latency of data transmission in the Boardfly setup is 50 percent lower than on a 3D torus for inference workloads. That means that the new Collectives Acceleration Engine (CAE) offload chips on the Zebrafish TPU 8i devices can be kept fed. The combination of more raw compute plus the flatter Boardfly interconnect and the CAE units to make it sit up and bark is why the throughput for GenAI inference has gone up by a factor of three or higher between Ironwood and Zebrafish. Here is one rendering of the Boardfly topology: And here is another one: With Boardfly, the eight TPU 8i chips on the Zebrafish system board are linked in an all-to-all configuration using ICI ports. Some ICI ports on each device are left over such that they can be allocated to link together eight boards into a higher order all-to-all connection, making any of the 32 TPU 8i chips in this rackscale system able to reach any other TPU in either one or two hops, and using only copper cables, which are cheap. To get to the full 36 groups of TPUs with the 1,152 TPUs interconnected, Google uses its “Apollo” optical circuit switch (part of its Jupiter datacenter network) to provide the links between TPU groups. Here is the worst case hop count across that Boardfly ICI-Apollo OCS network combo: The reason the ICI-OCS combo can lower the hop count is simple: The OCS switch has a crazy number of optical ports, and therefore the Zebrafish TPU 8i system boards can have many more optical transceivers on the board, increasing the number of light pipes coming off the board. (We don’t know how many more, but it is probably somewhere on the order of 4X to 8X more links between the 32-way ICI clusters than was possible with the optical links in the corners of the 3D torus. Scaling Out For AI Training The demands of AI training are different, and Google does not want to use the OCS devices unless it has to. (They are a lot more expensive and rare than an Ethernet switch based on a Broadcom, Cisco Systems, or Nvidia ASIC.) Google is vague about the feeds and speeds for the hardware underneath the Virgo scale out network that is debuting with the TPU 8t training clusters, but what it has said is that instead of just focusing on high port speeds, Google is balancing the bandwidth needs against the desire to have high radix devices (meaning with lots of ports) that flatten the network (meaning fewer hops once again) as well as make it less expensive. We do know that the resulting Virgo network delivers a flat, non-blocking, two layer topology for interlinking racks of accelerators, which can be GPUs or TPUs. The Apollo OCS switches are not used to scale out AI clusters, but rather to link to other compute and storage resources in the Google datacenters. Google says that the Virgo fabric can interlink as many as 134,000 TPU 8t chips and provide 47 Pb/sec of non-blocking bi-sectional bandwidth in a single fabric. The company said in a deep dive blog that the Virgo network has 400 Gb/sec per accelerator on the Sunfish TPU 8t, which is four times the 100 Gb/sec provided by the port on the Ironwood v7e accelerator for scale out, and says that the latency is 40 percent lower than the fabric latency of the prior scale out Ethernet network used with the Ironwood training clusters. Here is how Google is building very large TPU training clusters. The Sunfish TPU 8t can scale to 9,600 compute engines using the ICI in a 3D torus. Using the Virgo datacenter network, which has all kinds of RDMA enhancements and which we think is borrowing ideas from the Aquila protocol and the TiN hybrid switch-NIC chippery, plus extensions to the JAX and Pathways AI frameworks, Google can scale to 134,000 chips in a single Virgo fabric, and using OCS switches to interlink Virgo fabrics, Google can stretch that to over 1 million TPUs in a single logical training cluster. Last but not least, Google is adding RDMA support to the TPU 8t and is network interface cards to create what it calls TPUDirect RDMA and TPU Direct Storage, which might have a familiar ring to them give that these have long since been enabled in the Nvidia GPU hardware and software stack: These two new features will no doubt speed up a lot of AI training, but how much Google did not say much. The company did say that using TPUDirect Storage with its Managed Lustre 10T storage service boosted storage access by a factor of 10X compared to not having it on Ironwood TPUs. I was surprised there was not RDMA for TPU memory and for storage access already.