{"slug": "new-evidence-same-choice-testing-physical-experiment-selection-in-vision-models", "title": "New Evidence, Same Choice: Testing Physical Experiment Selection in Vision Language Models", "summary": "A new arXiv paper (2609.11022v1) introduces a controlled benchmark testing whether vision language models can decide when to answer a physical reasoning question immediately versus when to select the cheapest additional experiment, across six open models and 144 physical parameter sets. Direct responses repeated the same action for 95.1% to 100% of matched image pairs even when the correct action changed, and the best model made both decisions correctly for only 5.9% of image pairs. The authors report that evaluating evidence selection separately from final answers exposes measurement interpretation, physical reasoning, and response formatting failures that conventional answer accuracy overlooks.", "body_md": "arXiv:2609.11022v1 Announce Type: new \nAbstract: A model first sees an image from one physical measurement experiment, such as how far a block coasted, and must answer a question about a new trial, such as whether the block will pass a target after a fixed push. The initial experiment may provide enough information to answer, or the model may need another measurement, such as the object's mass, friction, restitution, or spring stiffness. We study whether vision language models can decide when to answer immediately and, when more evidence is needed, which experiment to perform. Current physical reasoning benchmarks usually evaluate only the final answer, so they do not directly measure this decision-making ability. We introduce a controlled evaluation where each problem provides one measurement image and four possible physical worlds created by combining two possible masses and two possible values of another relevant property. The model must either stop and answer or select the cheapest additional experiment that can resolve the question. We construct matched problem pairs where changing either the observed measurement or the question changes the optimal action. Since all possible worlds and experiment costs are known, we can explicitly determine the optimal choice. Across six open models and 144 physical parameter sets, direct responses repeat the same action for 95.1% to 100% of image pairs even when the correct action changes. Brief reasoning improves action switching, but the best model makes both decisions correctly for only 5.9% of image pairs. Additional analysis reveals failures in measurement interpretation, physical reasoning, and response formatting. By evaluating evidence selection separately from final answers, our benchmark reveals limitations in physical reasoning that conventional answer accuracy can overlook.", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/new-evidence-same-choice-testing-physical-experiment-selection-in-vision-models", "canonical_source": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11022", "published_at": "2026-09-11 04:00:00+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-09-11 04:29:33.513450+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["artificial-intelligence", "machine-learning", "ai-research", "computer-vision", "natural-language-processing"], "entities": ["arXiv", "vision language models"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/new-evidence-same-choice-testing-physical-experiment-selection-in-vision-models", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/new-evidence-same-choice-testing-physical-experiment-selection-in-vision-models.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/new-evidence-same-choice-testing-physical-experiment-selection-in-vision-models.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/new-evidence-same-choice-testing-physical-experiment-selection-in-vision-models.jsonld"}}