cd /news/ai-research/neurips-and-emnlp-2025-and-2026-on-o… · home › topics › ai-research › article
[ARTICLE · art-160414] src=discuss.huggingface.co ↗ pub= topic=ai-research verified=true sentiment=· neutral

NeurIPS and EMNLP 2025 and 2026 on one embedding map: how much do they overlap?

An analysis by Hadi Mohammadi embedding all 23,984 NeurIPS and EMNLP papers from 2025 and 2026 with Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B found the two conferences moving closer but still distinct: the share of NeurIPS papers whose nearest neighbour was at EMNLP rose from 23% in 2025 to 29% in 2026, and the reverse direction from 22% to 25%, using equal-size samples of 3,000 papers per side over 50 draws. A logistic regression predicting conference from the vector fell to an AUC of 0.89 in 2026 from 0.93, and the share of papers in hexagons both conferences occupy about equally rose from 23% to 32%. The largest driver was LLM agents, where two thirds of papers now sit in shared hexagons, up from a third, while the share of authors publishing at both conferences did not rise at equal size.

read2 min views1 publishedOct 29, 2026
NeurIPS and EMNLP 2025 and 2026 on one embedding map: how much do they overlap?
Image: Discuss (auto-discovered)

I embedded the title and abstract of all 23,984 NeurIPS and EMNLP papers from 2025 and 2026 with Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B and put them on one map. I wanted to know if the two conferences are turning into one.

They moved closer, but they are still far from the same.

  • In 2025, 23% of NeurIPS papers had their nearest neighbour at EMNLP. In 2026 it is 29%. The other way round it went from 22% to 25%. Both use equal-size samples (3,000 papers per side, 50 draws), because NeurIPS is much bigger.
  • A logistic regression that predicts the conference from the vector gets an AUC of 0.89 in 2026, down from 0.93.
  • Cutting the 2D map into hexagons, 23% of papers sat in hexagons both conferences share about equally in 2025, and 32% in 2026. Subsampling 2026 to the size of 2025 still gives 31%.
  • The biggest part of the rise is LLM agents: two thirds of those papers now sit in shared hexagons, up from a third. Benchmarks and LLM judges went from 8% to 40%.
  • The authors did not converge. At equal size, the share of people with a paper at both did not go up.

Abstracts changed style a lot between the two years. “Novel” dropped from a third of NeurIPS abstracts to about one in nine, so I checked that this is not what drives it. A TF-IDF classifier on titles alone also drops, from 0.86 to 0.82, and the nearest-neighbour shares still rise after projecting out the average 2025 to 2026 shift. 30 or 60 topics instead of 40, and EMNLP’s main track only, give the same picture. The 2026 data are pre-release versions of both paper lists.

Interactive map (switch years, tap a hexagon to see its papers): [Where NeurIPS and EMNLP overlap — Hadi Mohammadi](https://mohammadi.cv/ai-conferences/2026/overlap)

Code and data: [GitHub - mohammadi-hadi/ai-conferences: NeurIPS and EMNLP 2025-2026 on one map: did the two conferences move closer? · GitHub](https://github.com/mohammadi-hadi/ai-conferences)

One question for people who work with embeddings: is there a better way to measure how much two corpora overlap than nearest-neighbour mixing on equal-size samples? I would like to know what you would use.

── more in #ai-research 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @neurips 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/neurips-and-emnlp-20…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-10-29 · —