{"slug": "michael-burry-says-a-crash-is-coming-is-it", "title": "Michael Burry Says a Crash Is Coming. Is It?", "summary": "Michael Burry, the investor famous for betting against the housing market, warned that the stock market could be near a major top and may experience a '1987-type fall,' as the S&P 500 hit record highs twice last week, up 13% year-to-date. Bulls point to strong Q2 earnings growth of 27% and accelerating cloud revenue, while bears highlight that AI investment drives nearly half of S&P 500 earnings growth and one-third of U.S. economic growth, posing a risk if the build-out falters.", "body_md": "# Michael Burry Says a Crash Is Coming. Is It?\n\n### Plus: SpaceX’s earnings exposed two problems\n\n# 3.3%\n\nThat’s the share of American adults who identify as gay or lesbian, down from 4.7% in 2020.\n\nBulls vs. bears: Who’s right about this market?\n\nSpaceX survived its lockup. Its Q2 earnings? Not so much\n\n**The Market Just Hit Record Highs. Where Does It Go From Here?**\n\nLast week, the S&P 500 hit fresh record highs … twice. On Tuesday, the index climbed nearly 2% to its first **record close** since June, and the following day it notched another intraday all-time high. So far this year, the index is up **13%,** above its long-term average return of 10%.\n\nThe rally has led some investors to believe the worst of the** AI-driven sell-off** is behind us. But not everyone is convinced. **Michael Burry r** ecently warned that “it is possible we are near a major top,” adding that the market could be setting up for “a **1987-type fall**.”\n\nSo who’s right: the **bulls** or the **bears?**\n\n*The bull case*\n\nThe bull case hinges on three main arguments. First, Iran and Oman are nearing a deal to manage the Strait of Hormuz, which could be a step toward reopening it to commercial traffic. That would bring down the **cost of oil **and other goods, lessening the persistent threat of inflation.\n\nAdditionally, second quarter **earnings** have been **strong.** The S&P 500 is on track to deliver **27%** earnings growth in the second quarter compared with last year — and that’s excluding Amazon’s and Alphabet’s nonoperating, unrealized gains in their equity stakes in SpaceX and Anthropic. That’s more than **double** the S&P 500’s 10-year **average earnings growth** of 11%.\n\nThe big **cloud** companies had a particularly strong quarter. Average revenue growth for Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) accelerated from** 29%** last year to **54%** this year.\n\nJosh Brown, co-founder and CEO of Ritholtz Wealth Management, pointed to another bullish signal: “A healthy market **takes out its own trash.**” Brown isn’t referencing the chore, but rather the recent blowups of particularly **speculative** trading strategies. Overleveraged investors in **South Korea **suffered massive volatility and drawdowns, and **Leopold Aschenbrenner’s **hedge fund was margin-called, as Brown put it, “into the Stone Age.” The rationale is that a healthy, balanced market eliminates overly speculative bets and rewards companies with strong fundamentals.\n\n*The bear case*\n\nThere’s plenty to be nervous about. The most obvious risk is that **one unproven bet,** AI, is supporting both the U.S. stock market and the economy. Goldman Sachs estimates that AI investment will drive** nearly half **of S&P 500 earnings growth this year, and Michael Pearce, an economist at Oxford Economics, estimates that AI is responsible for** one-third** of recent U.S. economic growth.\n\nAs a share of GDP, capex spending on data centers is now **larger** than telecom’s share of GDP in the **2000s.** It’s also growing faster. AI capex added 0.85 percentage points to GDP in just one year; the housing boom added 0.5 percentage points at its peak, and the telecom build-out added 0.15 percentage points.\n\nThis presents a **risk.** AI has become a crucial source of growth in a short amount of time. If the build-out were to falter, economic expansion would **suffer immediately. **The sharp reversal would outpace the economy’s capacity to reallocate labor and capital elsewhere.\n\nAs Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo, explained: “A cycle that **builds** at 0.85 percentage points a year can **unwind** at a** similar pace,** and that, rather than the build-out itself, is the macro risk if AI demand disappoints.”\n\nCapital is flowing to the hyperscalers and neoclouds for their cloud products and data centers; to the semiconductor and memory stocks for their chips; and to materials and industrial companies for their construction of data centers. That’s a **diverse** array of recipients. But the **source** of that capital is** not diverse.** It’s coming from OpenAI and Anthropic. Bloomberg reported last week that OpenAI made up 70% of Microsoft’s AI sales last year, and Ed Zitron has reported the same is true for Amazon and Alphabet.\n\nOpenAI and Anthropic are selling products with **unproven ROI,** and both are burning tens of billions of dollars a year. If either runs into trouble raising money, the spending stops. And if the spending stops, it’s hard to see how the rest of the build-out doesn’t come down with it.\n\nAI is going to create a lot of **winners,** but just like the railroads, it’s also going to **bankrupt** a bunch of people along the way.\n\nIf we do have a correction, that doesn’t mean the technology failed. Those are **two different metrics,** and I think people conflate them. A **stock** price reflects what investors paid for future growth. A **technology’s** value is reflected in increased productivity and innovation.\n\nEven if there is a drawdown, America’s **risk-aggressive **culture has real societal benefits. We make extraordinary investments, we register extraordinary returns, and we accept the accompanying volatility.\n\n**SpaceX’s Lockup Expiration Went Fine. Its First Earnings Report Didn’t.**\n\nLast week marked SpaceX’s first post-IPO lockup expiration, giving employees and early investors their first opportunity to **sell shares **since the company went public. In total, more than 911 million insider shares became eligible to trade, more than **doubling** the free float. On the day the lockup expired, the stock** increased 6%.**\n\nThat came just days after SpaceX reported its first **earnings** as a public company. On the surface, the results** looked impressive**: Revenue surged 92% year over year, and operating losses narrowed to $143 million from $970 million in the year-ago quarter. The reason for that narrowing? SpaceX added $1.8 billion in **new revenue** from AI. More on that later.\n\nThe majority of SpaceX’s revenue came from **Starlink.** Sales this quarter increased 66% year-over-year while operating margins increased nearly 3%, and **subscribers** doubled to **12 million.**\n\nHowever, the stock fell 14% after reporting earnings because of SpaceX’s skyrocketing **capital expenditures,** which rose to $18.4 billion this quarter from $2.8 billion last year. At this pace, SpaceX will burn through all **$86 billion of IPO proceeds** in about 14 months — and that assumes the spend stops accelerating, which it hasn’t.\n\nOn the earnings call, CEO Elon Musk told investors that SpaceX will build **data centers on the moon **“faster than you think,” and that those data centers would be staffed by **humanoid robots.** In the near term, that seems unlikely. Of the **50 **Earthly companies that are working in the field of humanoid robotics, [fewer](https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/industrials/our-insights/humanoid-robots-crossing-the-chasm-from-concept-to-commercial-reality) than **10** have advanced beyond **small-scale testing.** Read more on the gap between humanoid robot hype and reality [here](https://www.profgmedia.com/p/why-tech-is-irrationally-obsessed).\n\nOverall, SpaceX’s earnings weren’t strong enough to reverse the stock’s **decline.** SpaceX is down **11%** since its IPO and **40%** from its all-time high. Musk’s other public company **Tesla** is also in the red, down almost 30% year to date.\n\nCould the Musk premium be disappearing? It’s hard to imagine how one person could manage being CEO of **two public companies** and de facto head of a **major social media platform** at the same time. The mathematical reality is that Musk is a **part-time CEO.** The question, then, is how long will investors **tolerate** this arrangement?\n\nMy son told me a stat that I thought was so interesting. He said that **no one **is ever able to stay airborne for longer than a second. Even Michael Jordan. They can get to 0.97, maybe even 0.98, but **gravity** always **wins.**\n\nI believe that gravity exists in the stock market, too. Over time, every meme stock just becomes a stock.\n\nIt’s happening now to **Tesla.** Tesla is a great car company, and it should trade at the top of the valuation range for the auto sector, which means it has another **70%** or **80%** to fall.\n\nSpaceX is an amazing **space launch** and **satellite** business that has a near monopoly. But even if it doubles, which it eventually will, there’s still no way to justify the current valuation. In the end, **gravity** is **undefeated.**\n\nElon is spending half his time on Twitter, tweeting about wokeness or about things happening in Minnesota or God knows what.\n\nHe has genuinely **rotted.** He’s totally lost his marbles, and I think we’re finally **reaching a point **where investors are at least beginning to recognize that. Musk doesn’t sound like some **crazy genius** who understands things about the future — he sounds like a crazy person who’s lost his grip on **reality.**\n\nSpaceX’s decline is just beginning, and it will be the tide that drags down all boats.\n\nAswath Damodaran joins Ed Elson and Scott Galloway to unpack the AI race, his growing concern about the Magnificent Seven, and whether SpaceX’s valuation holds up. Watch [here](https://www.profgmedia.com/p/aswath-damodaran-big-tech-has-no?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=7157411&post_id=210200453&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=kaf1y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email).\n\nWhat Do You Think Is Acceptable to Wear at the Office? Take\n\n*The WSJ*’s[Quiz](https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/workplace/what-do-you-think-is-acceptable-to-wear-at-the-office-take-our-quiz-b3950bfb?st=RJYF3t&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink)Yes, You Can End a Sentence With a\n\n[Proposition](https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/prepositions-ending-a-sentence-with)Want to Run the N.Y.C.\n\n[Marathon](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/06/nyregion/nyc-marathon-lottery.html?unlocked_article_code=1.3lA._QzU.fNDNKC39PlBc&smid=url-share)? You May Have to Enter Another Lottery", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/michael-burry-says-a-crash-is-coming-is-it", "canonical_source": "https://www.profgmedia.com/p/michael-burry-says-a-crash-is-coming", "published_at": "2026-08-10 11:04:22+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-08-10 11:20:11.521738+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["artificial-intelligence"], "entities": ["Michael Burry", "S&P 500", "Josh Brown", "Ritholtz Wealth Management", "Goldman Sachs", "Oxford Economics", "Apollo", "Torsten Slok"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/michael-burry-says-a-crash-is-coming-is-it", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/michael-burry-says-a-crash-is-coming-is-it.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/michael-burry-says-a-crash-is-coming-is-it.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/michael-burry-says-a-crash-is-coming-is-it.jsonld"}}