{"slug": "meta-reportedly-got-too-addicted-to-google-ai-tokens-and-had-to-be-cut-off", "title": "Meta Reportedly Got Too Addicted to Google AI Tokens and Had to Be Cut Off", "summary": "Google cut off Meta's access to its Gemini AI tokens in March after Meta's excessive usage strained Google's capacity, disrupting Meta's internal AI projects and forcing it to impose efficiency measures. The restrictions contributed to Google's decision to rent compute from SpaceX for $920 million per month.", "body_md": "Meta was reportedly minding its own business this past March, just trying to gorge itself on Gemini tokens, and all of a sudden Google said it was cut off. This is according to an anonymously sourced [story in the Financial Times](https://www.ft.com/content/c5d52f72-71ef-40bc-bad3-61afdba8b378?syn-25a6b1a6=1).\n\nIn March, it emerged that Meta was one of the largest companies [taking part in the Tokenmaxxing trend](https://gizmodo.com/tech-employees-are-reportedly-being-evaluated-by-how-fast-they-burn-through-llm-tokens-2000736627)—literally evaluating employees by how many AI tokens they were using at work. This moment coincided with another fad: the one for *t*oken-hungry agentic AI platforms like OpenClaw, which were being used by anxious software engineers to achieve [ostensibly](https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnwerner/2026/04/22/problems-with-openclaw-youre-not-alone/) unprecedented new levels of workplace efficiency.\n\nCiting “three people familiar with the matter,” the Financial Times now says Google informed Meta that it wasn’t able to keep up with its AI use, and imposed limits on the company’s use of Gemini models.\n\nThe move has, FT says:\n\n“…disrupted and delayed some of Meta’s internal AI projects. Owing to the restrictions, which remain in place, as well as a broader push to streamline AI costs, Meta has encouraged staff to be more efficient with AI tokens — the units that measure AI usage, several people said.”\n\nIn other words, Meta replaced tokenmaxxing with judicious token-counting. Sad!\n\nThe burden on Google’s resources, meanwhile, could have helped along Google’s decision in early June to [rent compute from SpaceX](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/05/google-to-pay-spacex-920-million-a-month-for-xai-compute-capacity.html), the parent company of xAI for $920 million per month.\n\nThe FT says other large companies also strained Google’s AI capacity and were subject to caps, but it sounds like those problems weren’t as serious. According to the FT’s sources, Meta was exceptional, even among the other AI high-rollers.\n\nMeta and Google declined the FT’s requests for comment.", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/meta-reportedly-got-too-addicted-to-google-ai-tokens-and-had-to-be-cut-off", "canonical_source": "https://gizmodo.com/meta-reportedly-got-too-addicted-to-google-ai-tokens-and-had-to-be-cut-off-2000778727", "published_at": "2026-06-29 09:00:00+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-06-29 09:05:00.488806+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["large-language-models", "ai-infrastructure", "ai-tools", "ai-agents"], "entities": ["Meta", "Google", "Gemini", "Financial Times", "SpaceX", "xAI", "OpenClaw"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/meta-reportedly-got-too-addicted-to-google-ai-tokens-and-had-to-be-cut-off", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/meta-reportedly-got-too-addicted-to-google-ai-tokens-and-had-to-be-cut-off.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/meta-reportedly-got-too-addicted-to-google-ai-tokens-and-had-to-be-cut-off.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/meta-reportedly-got-too-addicted-to-google-ai-tokens-and-had-to-be-cut-off.jsonld"}}