arXiv:2610.32013v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper studies the problem of test-time robustness scaling for large vision-language models (LVLMs), which aims to mitigate language bias during inference. Existing approaches typically adopt test-time scaling techniques such as contrastive decoding to improve inference performance. Despite the progress, the performance of these approaches is far from satisfactory due to intentional evidence removal during perturbations and redundant inference cost. Towards this end, we propose a novel approach named Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration (MAGIC). The core of our MAGIC is to evaluate the decision margins of LVLMs to selectively activate textual and visual perturbation branches for efficient debiased inference. In particular, our MAGIC first measures the prediction margins of crucial tokens, and applies a gating function to identify low-confidence responses that are susceptible to language biases. For selected samples, we integrate the token logits from multiple textual and image perturbation branches with the original ones for debiased decision. More importantly, we selectively restore the most informative corrupted views with sharp prediction distributions for ambiguous samples after debiasing, enabling evidence recovery for discriminative decision-making. We further utilize a calibration dataset to actively identify and prune ineffective branches during contrastive debiasing for cost reduction. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed MAGIC in comparison with extensive baselines.
MAGIC: Margin-gated Contrastive Debiasing with Evidence Restoration for VLM Test-time Robustness Scaling
A new arXiv paper (2610.32013v1) proposes MAGIC, a method for test-time robustness scaling of large vision-language models that uses decision-margin gating to selectively activate textual and visual perturbation branches only for low-confidence predictions. MAGIC's authors report that the approach restores the most informative corrupted views for ambiguous samples after debiasing and prunes ineffective branches using a calibration dataset to cut inference cost, with experiments on benchmark datasets showing gains over extensive baselines. The work targets language bias during inference, which the authors say existing contrastive decoding methods handle poorly because of intentional evidence removal during perturbations and redundant inference cost.
Run your AI side-project on zahid.host
EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.