# Lets Investigate The Hype Around Facebook’s Big Comeback With Muse Spark 1.1, Fact or Fiction

> Source: <https://pub.towardsai.net/lets-investigate-the-hype-around-facebooks-big-comeback-with-muse-spark-1-1-fact-or-fiction-8317fdf51af9?source=rss----98111c9905da---4>
> Published: 2026-07-16 19:01:02+00:00

Member-only story

# Lets Investigate The Hype Around Facebook’s Big Comeback With Muse Spark 1.1, Fact or Fiction

Meta put Muse Spark 1.1 into public preview on July 9. The part I care about is not the usual claim that a new model can plan, code and use tools. It is the economics of giving a multimodal worker a real job inside an agent loop: $1.25 per million input tokens, $4.25 per million output tokens, 118.1 output tokens per second, and a 1M-token context window, according to Artificial Analysis.

That combination makes the model worth routing into bounded work now. Screenshot triage, browser-and-tool tasks, scoped bug fixes, long-document extraction and repeatable verifier loops all become cheaper to run. Meta is calling the model a step toward personal superintelligence. I would keep the claim smaller: Muse Spark 1.1 looks like a serious worker model before it looks like a proven long-horizon main agent.

I am Caspar Bannink, and I build AI products and agent workflows. [HomeScout](https://homescout.io), my AI rental-search product for Dublin renters and expats, has no connection to Meta or Muse Spark. I write the practical routing notes here on [CasparAI](https://medium.com/@CasparAI) and on [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/caspar-bannink-719440217/).

## The independent receipt is better than the launch wording

Artificial Analysis currently gives the xhigh reasoning configuration an…
