Lawler Attacks Conley on Data Centers — While Tiptoeing Around the Issue Himself

Republican Congressmember Mike Lawler launched a seven-figure ad campaign last week attacking Democratic challenger Cait Conley over data centers, citing her consulting work for two defense tech firms and asking whether she supports Governor Kathy Hochul's one-year moratorium on new large data centers. Conley has already said she backs the moratorium and in July said she would "push at the federal level for similar responsible regulation and legislation to ensure that data center companies are not exploiting our communities," while Lawler has criticized the pause as anti-business and is cosponsoring the bipartisan Ratepayer Protection Act to make data centers pay full infrastructure upgrade costs, a bill opposed by the Data Center Coalition and debated in the House on Tuesday before a final vote was postponed.

Congressmember Mike Lawler is seizing a new wedge against his Democratic challenger Cait Conley in their closely watched Hudson Valley race: data centers. The GOP incumbent’s new seven-figure ad campaign https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlR9JP1khLo , launched last week, cites Conley’s consulting work https://theintercept.com/2026/02/09/new-york-cait-conley-ai-palantir-dhs/ for two defense tech firms as an indication that she “wants to build data centers in the Hudson Valley.” An accompanying press release https://www.lawlerforcongress.com/2026/09/12/cait-conley-has-hundreds-of-thousands-of-reasons-to-want-data-centers-in-the-hudson-valley/ asks, “Does she support Governor Kathy Hochul’s moratorium on new large data centers, yes or no?” There’s just one catch: Conley has already said she backs Hochul’s one-year pause on data center construction, while Lawler has criticized the pause as reflecting a broader anti-business climate in New York. “When you look at the situation, and Kathy Hochul implements a statewide moratorium, what she is saying is, ‘Don’t come here, go do your business elsewhere,’ which is why New York state leads the nation in outmigration,” Lawler told https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/new-york-republican-congressman-rips-hochul-policies-sending-businesses-dont-come-here-message Fox Business in August. Conley, meanwhile, has championed https://www.instagram.com/reels/Da1AqcPPvEn/ Hochul’s moratorium, saying in July that, if elected, she would “push at the federal level for similar responsible regulation and legislation to ensure that data center companies are not exploiting our communities.” Lawler’s new ad campaign disregards this record; the 30-second spot replays — three times — a clip of Conley saying, during an April candidate forum, “We need data centers.” It leaves out what she said https://youtu.be/vFB8lszjMVQ?si=NZr2QEJjOpZfuj83&t=4481 just beforehand: “Local officials who are approving these projects need to understand the harm that they are going to bring. … Communities are unwittingly agreeing to terms where these data centers are literally profiting off the backs of our communities.” “We need data centers. We’re not going to get rid of them,” she continued, but added, “We can mandate things to make sure they are better going forward than what we are seeing play out.” As of July, Conley still worked with one of the two firms at the center of Lawler’s ad campaign, according to an interview with the Rockland County Business Journal https://rcbizjournal.com/2026/07/22/cait-conley-is-not-afraid-to-show-voters-who-she-is-or-who-shes-worked-for/ . But she said that hasn’t influenced her views on data centers. Lawler’s campaign did not answer New York Focus’s questions about his position on Hochul’s moratorium or a number of controversial data center projects in the district. “Congressman Lawler believes local residents should decide what gets built in their community,” wrote Lawler’s campaign manager Ciro Riccardi in an emailed statement. “Municipalities should use every tool available to protect residents’ quality of life and keep the cost off ratepayers, who already pay a third more for electricity than New Jersey and Pennsylvania because of Albany’s energy policies.” Lawler is currently consponsoring a bill https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9340/text , called the Ratepayer Protection Act, aimed at making data centers pay the full cost of any infrastructure upgrades needed to meet their voracious energy demands. The bipartisan bill has drawn opposition https://www.eenews.net/articles/data-center-lobby-grumbles-about-reworked-ratepayer-protection-act-2/ from an industry trade group, the Data Center Coalition, which says it unfairly singles out the computing facilities. The bill was debated in the House on Tuesday, though a final vote was postponed. But Lawler has steered clear of local fights. He has not taken a position — either publicly or in response to New York Focus’s questions — on the expansion of a Rockland County data center operated by the Texas-based company Databank. The project is one of several in the area that have received large tax breaks https://nysfocus.com/2026/04/20/data-center-tax-break-jpmorgan-chase from local authorities, and it has generated significant local backlash https://www.lohud.com/story/news/politics/2026/03/27/rockland-ny-data-center-growth-plan-fuels-push-back-over-power-use-cost/89298715007/ over concerns that it could raise power bills and contaminate the local water supply. Databank has said the facility will use a closed-loop water system that poses no risk to the adjacent reservoir. Conley announced her opposition https://caitconley.com/cait-conley-issues-statement-on-databank-phase-ii-datacenter-in-orangetown/ to the center in July. “Let’s be clear — Cait Conley supports a data center moratorium. Mike Lawler opposes one,” said Conley spokesperson Maddy Rosen in a statement. “Mike Lawler can lie all he wants to cover up his disastrous record, but at the end of the day, all you have to do is follow the money.” Conley’s campaign pointed to donations https://www.opensecrets.org/profiles/mike-lawler/us congress/pacs?cycle=2026&display=combined&mpid=1100341 to Lawler’s campaign from banks that have built data centers in the district, namely JPMorganChase https://nysfocus.com/2026/04/20/data-center-tax-break-jpmorgan-chase and Morgan Stanley. Lawler has received donations from many other financial services companies as well. Her camp also highlighted Lawler’s support for data center–friendly legislation, including President Donald Trump’s flagship One Big Beautiful Bill Act in 2025. An early House version https://www.mcdermottlaw.com/insights/no-state-ai-law-moratorium-in-one-big-beautiful-bill-act/ that Lawler voted for would have barred states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. That provision was blocked by the Senate, but the final law included others https://www.gerberco.com/tax-considerations-for-data-center-projects-in-the-age-of-ai/ that could https://www.globest.com/2026/09/08/data-center-opposition-brings-new-scrutiny-to-opportunity-zones/ fuel data center construction. Conley’s campaign told New York Focus, however, that she supports the Ratepayer Protection Act. As the data center fight consumes the midterm elections, containing energy costs is one area of bipartisan agreement. Trump, too, has embraced a version https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/07/president-trumps-ratepayer-protection-pledge-secures-american-ai-dominance-protects-consumers/ of the idea: This summer, he pledged to keep consumer bills low, though he has lately defended data centers in increasingly strident terms. “There is a SICK conspiracy going on against AI and Data Centers, and the only one that is happy about it is China,” he wrote on Truth Social https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117269745153543631 on Monday. “WHOEVER WINS AI, WINS ”