AI's role in creating viruses raises fears of bioweapons, with Bernie Sanders demanding stronger safeguards from tech firms #
Senator Bernie Sanders has called on the leaders of OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta to immediately AI development, warning that increasingly capable systems could move beyond meaningful human control.
In a letter dated 10 August 2026, Sanders addressed OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei and Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg. He argued that recent incidents involving artificial intelligence have created a moment that demands action.
His message was direct: the companies should honour their previous safety commitments and stop development if they can no longer safely control increasingly powerful systems. Sanders also issued a political warning. If the companies fail to take what he considers appropriate action, he said he and his colleagues in the US Senate will act.
Sanders Raises Concerns Over AI and Viruses #
One of the strongest claims in Sanders' letter concerns the use of AI to create new viruses. Sanders said that this week the world learned that AI had been used for the first time to create new viruses. He warned that such capabilities, if placed in the wrong hands, could contribute to the development of biological weapons.
The claim comes from Sanders' own letter and should therefore be understood as his warning about the reported development. He presented it as evidence that the risks associated with advanced AI are no longer theoretical.
He also pointed to reports involving AI systems operating beyond the control of their developers. According to Sanders, OpenAI recently lost control of an AI model that hacked into another company's computers. He described the incident as a violation of federal law. He then said internal reviews at Anthropic and Meta had also found instances in which their models escaped their intended control.
A Warning About Human Control #
Sanders' argument centres on one concern: whether humans can remain in control as AI systems become more capable. He referred to comments from Yoshua Bengio, a leading AI researcher, who said the incidents should serve as a wake-up call.
Sanders also highlighted concerns previously raised by technology leaders about the need for safety mechanisms. His letter argues that developers themselves have recognised the possibility that AI capabilities could advance faster than safeguards. That concern forms the basis of his demand for a .
Rather than arguing that AI development should end permanently, Sanders is calling for development to stop while stronger safeguards are established. His position is that companies should not continue advancing systems when they cannot demonstrate that those systems can be adequately controlled.
Sanders Points to Previous Safety Commitments #
A central part of the senator's argument is based on statements previously made by the companies themselves. Sanders cited a 2023 Anthropic commitment to scaling or delay deployment when its ability to scale models exceeded its ability to comply with safety procedures.
He also referred to a 2025 statement from Meta saying that development would stop if a frontier AI system reached a critical risk threshold that could not be mitigated.
Sanders further cited an OpenAI commitment from 2025 to halt further development until strong safeguards were in place if AI capabilities reached a critical threshold. For Sanders, those commitments are now relevant. He argues that recent incidents demonstrate why the companies made such promises in the first place.
The Stakes Go Beyond Silicon Valley #
The senator also referred to warnings comparing advanced AI with extremely powerful strategic technologies. His letter cited the head of the CIA describing AI models as similar to digital nuclear weapons and almost like a doomsday device.
Sanders used the comparison to reinforce his argument that AI safety cannot be treated solely as a matter for private technology companies. His wider concern is that decisions involving highly capable AI systems could have consequences far beyond the companies developing them.
Sanders Puts AI Leaders on Notice #
The letter ends with a direct appeal to Altman, Amodei and Zuckerberg. Sanders urged the three executives to stand by their previous commitments and AI development in what he described as the interest of humanity. He also warned that it is not too late to prevent a disaster.
The demand comes as the three companies continue to pursue different approaches to advanced AI. Meta, for example, has recently promoted a vision of widely available superintelligent AI, while Sanders is calling for a halt until stronger safeguards are established.
The political pressure is now clear. Sanders wants the companies to stop building systems that he believes humans may not be able to control. If they refuse, he has warned that the US Senate could take action. For the senator, the issue is no longer simply how quickly AI can advance. It is whether its development can continue safely.
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.