cd /news/ai-policy/judge-orders-justin-baldoni-to-pay-b… · home topics ai-policy article
[ARTICLE · art-27976] src=mercurynews.com ↗ pub= topic=ai-policy verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Judge orders Justin Baldoni to pay Blake Lively’s legal fees

A federal judge ordered Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties to pay Blake Lively's legal fees after she accused him of sexual harassment and a smear campaign. The judge denied Lively's request for punitive damages, and a prior settlement involved no money exchanged. The ruling stems from Baldoni's defamation claim against Lively.

read2 min publishedJun 15, 2026

Getting your

Trinity Audioplayer ready...Just over a month after settling, the seemingly endless “It Ends With Us” legal saga might finally be over as a federal New York judge has ordered Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties to pay Blake Lively’s legal fees.

While Judge Lewis J. Liman on Friday signed off the “Gossip Girl” star’s request for the Wayfarer Parties to cover her legal fees, he denied her attempt at procuring punitive or treble damages from Baldoni and co., according to legal documents obtained by the Daily News. Lively, 38, accused 42-year-old Baldoni in December 2024 of having sexually harassed her on the set of the blockbuster domestic violence drama, “It Ends With Us,” and launched a smear campaign. Baldoni, who denied the allegations, filed a gargantuan defamation suit for $400 million against Lively and her camp, as well as a $250 million libel suit against The New York Times’ coverage of the claims.

Judge Lewis J. Liman tossed both filings and, earlier this year, also dismissed 10 of Lively’s 13 claims against her former director and co-star, including those related to sexual harassment and defamation.

A settlement, in which no money was awarded, was reached in early May, days before a trial was set to start. Liman on Friday reasoned that Lively sought attorneys’ fees “as a result of the Wayfarer Parties’ own defamation claim,” and denied the latter’s argument that having to pay the fees would violate the First Amendment.

Lively sought damages under a provision related to “Costs; Attorney’s Fees” that does not mention any damages, which Liman identified as her “circumvent[ing] this web of procedures and processes designed for the orderly, just, and fair determination of civil claims in federal court.”

Shortly after the settlement, news broke that — under California legislation — Lively was seeking damages and attorney’s fees related to Baldoni’s defamation filing, which the actress said was retaliatory.

── more in #ai-policy 4 stories · sorted by recency
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/judge-orders-justin-…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-06-15 ·