{"slug": "intuitive-self-models-2024", "title": "Intuitive Self-Models (2024)", "summary": "A new blog series proposes that consciousness, free will, and related phenomena arise from the brain's predictive learning algorithm building generative models of itself, called 'intuitive self-models.' The series explores how these models explain trance, dissociation, enlightenment, and hallucinations, challenging traditional views in philosophy of mind.", "body_md": "# Intuitive Self-Models\n\nThis is a rather ambitious series of blog posts, in that I’ll attempt to explain what’s the deal with consciousness, free will, hypnotism, enlightenment, hallucinations, flow states, dissociation, akrasia, delusions, and more.\n\nThe starting point for this whole journey is very simple:\n\n- The brain has a predictive (a.k.a. self-supervised) learning algorithm.\n- This algorithm builds generative models (a.k.a. “intuitive models”) that can predict incoming data.\n- It turns out that, in order to predict incoming data, the algorithm winds up not only building generative models capturing properties of trucks and shoes and birds, but also building generative models capturing properties\n*of the brain algorithm itself*.\n\nThose latter models, which I call *“intuitive self-models”*, wind up including ingredients like conscious awareness, deliberate actions, and the sense of applying one’s will.\n\nThat’s a simple idea, but exploring its consequences will take us to all kinds of strange places—plenty to fill up an eight-post series! Here’s the outline:\n\ngives some background on the brain’s predictive learning algorithm, how to think about the “intuitive models” built by that algorithm, how intuitive**Post 1 (****Preliminaries****)*** self*-models come about, and the relation of this whole series to Philosophy Of Mind.proposes that our intuitive self-models include an ingredient called “conscious awareness”, and that this ingredient is built by the predictive learning algorithm to represent a serial aspect of cortex computation. I’ll discuss ways in which this model is veridical (faithful to the algorithmic phenomenon that it’s modeling), and ways that it isn’t. I’ll also talk about how intentions and decisions fit into that framework.__Post 2 (____Conscious Awareness____)__focuses more specifically on the intuitive self-model that almost everyone reading this post is experiencing right now (as opposed to the other possibilities covered later in the series), which I call the__Post 3 (____The Active Self____)__*Conventional Intuitive Self-Model*. In particular, I propose that a key player in that model is a certain entity that’s conceptualized as actively causing acts of free will. I call this entity*the Active Self*, and relate it to intuitions around free will, desires vs urges, animate vs inanimate objects, and more.builds a framework to systematize the various types of trance, from everyday “flow states”, to intense possession rituals with amnesia. I try to explain why these states have the properties they do, and to reverse-engineer the various tricks that people use to induce trance in practice.__Post 4 (____Trance____)__is a brief opinionated tour of this controversial psychiatric diagnosis. Is it real? Is it iatrogenic? Why is it related to borderline personality disorder (BPD) and trauma? What do we make of the wild claim that each “alter” can’t remember the lives of the other “alters”?__Post 5 (____Dissociative Identity Disorder, a.k.a. Multiple Personality Disorder)__is a type of intuitive self-model, typically accessed via extensive meditation practice. It’s quite different from the conventional intuitive self-model. I offer a hypothesis about what exactly the difference is, and why that difference has the various downstream effects that it has.__Post 6 (____Awakening / Enlightenment / PNSE____)____Post 7____(Hearing Voices, and Other Hallucinations)__talks about factors contributing to hallucinations—although I argue*against*drawing a deep distinction between hallucinations versus “normal” inner speech and imagination. I discuss both psychological factors like schizophrenia and BPD; and cultural factors, including some critical discussion of Julian Jaynes’s*Origin of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind*.is, in a sense, the flip side of Post 3. Post 3 centers around the suite of intuitions related to free will. What are these intuitions? How did these intuitions wind up in my brain, even when they have (I argue) precious little relation to real psychology or neuroscience? But Post 3 left a critical question unaddressed: If free-will-related intuitions are the__Post 8____(Rooting Out Free Will Intuitions)__*wrong*way to think about the everyday psychology of motivation—desires, urges, akrasia, willpower, self-control, and more—then what’s the*right*way to think about all those things? This post offers a framework to fill that gap.", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/intuitive-self-models-2024", "canonical_source": "https://www.lesswrong.com/s/qhdHbCJ3PYesL9dde", "published_at": "2026-06-21 04:11:30+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-06-21 04:37:01.532503+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["neural-networks", "machine-learning", "ai-research", "ai-ethics"], "entities": ["Julian Jaynes"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/intuitive-self-models-2024", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/intuitive-self-models-2024.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/intuitive-self-models-2024.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/intuitive-self-models-2024.jsonld"}}