Git Brain is a visual Git GUI for VS Code, Cursor and other VS Code-compatible IDEs.
It's designed as a JetBrains-style Git experience and GitLens alternative, with a visual commit graph, Git history, diffs, branches, stashes, worktrees, a 3-way merge editor, AI Git workflows and a built-in MCP server for coding agents.
Website: https://git-brain.com
AI changed almost everything about how I write code.
Claude, Codex, Cursor, Copilot and coding agents can now do things that would've taken me hours.
But somehow, one of the oldest parts of the developer workflow still kept making me work: Git.
Not Git itself
Git is great, the experience around it,
And if you're coming from JetBrains IDEs, you probably know how nice Git can feel when all of this is actually connected.
I wanted that experience inside VS Code and the new generation of VS Code-based IDEs.
So we built Git Brain.
The idea behind Git Brain is pretty simple:
Put the everyday Git workflow into one visual workspace and make it hard to shoot yourself in the foot
Not another Git abstraction
Not a replacement for Git
A UI for actually understanding what Git is doing
Git Brain works inside VS Code, Cursor, Antigravity, Trae, Kiro, Windsurf, VSCodium and other VS Code-compatible editors.
This was one of the first things we cared about,
When I look at a repository, I don't just want a list of commits
I want to understand it.
Git Brain gives you a visual commit graph with branches, merges, tags, filtering, commit details and file diffs in the same flow.
You can inspect a commit, see exactly which files changed and jump directly into the diff without leaving the graph.
For me, that's much easier than trying to reconstruct the state of the repository in my head from a list of SHAs.
I never understood why resolving a complicated merge conflict still so often means staring at:
<<<<<<< HEAD
...
>>>>>>> feature
For small conflicts, fine.
For large ones?
No thanks.
Git Brain has a real 3-way merge editor:
Local | Result | Remote
You can see both versions, understand how they relate, choose either side or both, edit the result and move between conflicts visually.
It's heavily inspired by the type of Git experience I liked in full IDEs,
And this became even more important once coding agents entered the picture.
This was something I didn't fully expect
Agents generate code incredibly fast
But faster code generation also means:
So we started building AI around the Git workflow itself.
For example, Git Brain can analyze a large working tree and split the changes into logical commits.
Instead of:
fix stuff
with 47 unrelated files 😅
you can get a proposed commit structure, review it and decide exactly what belongs where.
It can also generate commit messages, summarize changes, help create PR descriptions and resolve conflicts.
But there was another problem.
If an agent is doing real development work, it needs more than access to files.
It needs to understand:
So Git Brain now includes a built-in MCP server.
That means agents like Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other MCP-compatible tools can interact with Git Brain and get structured Git context instead of blindly running shell commands.
The goal isn't to give an agent unlimited access to your machine.
Actually, the opposite.
We wanted to expose specific Git capabilities with guardrails around mutations and destructive actions.
I think this part is going to become much more important as we give coding agents more autonomy.
Another feature I personally think is becoming much more useful because of AI is Git worktrees.
You can have:
main
feature-auth
fix-production-bug
agent-experiment
all checked out at the same time without constantly switching branches.
That's perfect when you have multiple agents or tasks running in parallel.
But worktrees are one of those Git features that many developers know exist and still don't use.
Mostly because the CLI workflow isn't very inviting.
So Git Brain gives worktrees their own visual panel where you can create, inspect, open and remove them.
No memorizing git worktree commands required.
We get this question a lot.
Yes - Git Brain can be used as a GitLens alternative for VS Code, especially if what you want is a fast visual Git experience focused on everyday workflows.
But our bigger goal is slightly different.
We're trying to build the Git experience we want for the agentic development era:
Humans get a great visual interface. Agents get structured Git capabilities. Both operate on the same repository state.
GitLens has done a lot for Git inside VS Code, and we're not pretending otherwise.
We're just exploring a different direction.
At this point it has grown into much more than the little Git UI we originally imagined:
And we're still building.
Git Brain has already passed 70,000 downloads on Open VSX, which is kind of crazy to us considering this started because we were annoyed with our own Git workflow.
Git Brain is available for VS Code and VS Code-compatible IDEs.
If you use Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf or another compatible editor, I'd genuinely love for you to try it.
But even more than another install, I'm interested in this:
What is the one Git workflow you still hate doing?
Merge conflicts?
Rebase?
Cherry-picking?
Understanding what an agent changed?
Keeping multiple tasks alive at once?
Tell me in the comments.
There's a decent chance we'll build it 😅