Human oversight of erroneous clinical AI and decision support a systematic review and meta analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis covering 46 articles examined how clinicians respond when automated clinical advice is wrong, spanning ECG interpretation, rules-based clinical decision support, image-based AI, selective prediction, and LLMs/GenAI. The review, published on Safety Insights, aggregates evidence on human oversight of erroneous clinical AI and decision support.

What happens when automated clinical advice is wrong? This reviewed research on clinician responses to incorrect automated advice. Including ECG interpretation, rules-based clinical decision support, image-based AI, selective prediction, and LLMs/GenAI. 46 articles were included. Shared under an open access licence. PS. Check out my YouTube: https://youtube.com/@safe as pod?si=V2dbdmW–WbnhzA9 Shout a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson In all, they argue… Continue reading Human oversight of erroneous clinical AI and decision support a systematic review and meta analysis https://safetyinsights.org/2026/10/29/human-oversight-of-erroneous-clinical-ai-and-decision-support-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/