{"slug": "hubspot-tried-to-feed-its-ai-with-customer-data-the-revolt-took-four-days", "title": "HubSpot tried to feed its AI with customer data. The revolt took four days", "summary": "HubSpot scrapped a plan to use customer data for an AI feature after a four-day revolt, reversing a policy that opted users in by default. The CRM firm apologized and said any future data use would be opt-in, highlighting growing customer resistance to software vendors using their data for AI without explicit consent.", "body_md": "HubSpot has scrapped a plan to use its customers’ data for a new AI feature, just four days after announcing it. The CRM firm changed its terms on 1 July to pool customer data, including contact and employer details, for a tool that finds sales leads, [The Information](https://www.theinformation.com/newsletters/applied-ai/facing-revolt-hubspot-reverses-decision-use-customer-data-ai-feature) reported.\n\nIt opted users in by default. The backlash came at once.\n\nThe objection was less about AI than about consent. Customers argued that the data they had built up in HubSpot belonged to them, not to the company to share around. HubSpot set the default to opt-out. It enrolled everyone unless they hunted down a toggle. That turned a product tweak into a trust problem.\n\n## A four-day retreat\n\nThe [revolt](https://thenextweb.com/news/meta-applied-ai-unit-revolt-data-labeling-draftees) played out mostly on LinkedIn, where sales leaders and RevOps teams piled in. Some said they would switch providers. Within days HubSpot folded.\n\nChief product and technology officer Duncan Lennox apologised and called the change “a mistake”. He said HubSpot would not implement the new terms, and that any future use of customer data would be opt-in. The plan, in short, is dead.\n\n## The bigger nerve it hit\n\nThe speed of the climbdown says as much as the policy. Software firms are racing to [bolt AI](https://thenextweb.com/news/ai-workslop-knowledge-decay-harvard-business-review-productivity) onto their products, and customer data is the obvious [fuel](https://thenextweb.com/news/signal-whittaker-ai-chatbots-not-friends-copilot-backdoor-privacy). HubSpot is not the first to get burned. Slack drew fire in 2024, and Zoom in 2023, over terms that let them train AI on customer data. What stung this time is that CRM data is a company’s competitive asset, not just its files.\n\nIt also shows where power sits. In an era when a business can rebuild a workflow with [cheap AI tools](https://thenextweb.com/news/saaspocalypse-a-myth-the-real-cost-of-ai-built-software), big software [vendors](https://thenextweb.com/news/mark-cuban-vibe-coding-lovable-replit-ai-labs-moat) have less room to dictate terms. Annoy the customer base and it has more exits than it used to.\n\n## Why it matters\n\nThe episode is small, but it is a marker. Every SaaS company is weighing how to feed its AI without spooking the people who pay for it. HubSpot just ran the experiment in public, and learned that “opt-out” is now a fighting word.\n\n## Get the TNW newsletter\n\nGet the most important tech news in your inbox each week.", "url": "https://wpnews.pro/news/hubspot-tried-to-feed-its-ai-with-customer-data-the-revolt-took-four-days", "canonical_source": "https://thenextweb.com/news/hubspot-reverses-customer-data-ai-feature-opt-out", "published_at": "2026-07-08 20:28:58+00:00", "updated_at": "2026-07-08 21:14:41.517872+00:00", "lang": "en", "topics": ["ai-products", "ai-ethics", "ai-policy"], "entities": ["HubSpot", "Duncan Lennox", "The Information", "Slack", "Zoom"], "alternates": {"html": "https://wpnews.pro/news/hubspot-tried-to-feed-its-ai-with-customer-data-the-revolt-took-four-days", "markdown": "https://wpnews.pro/news/hubspot-tried-to-feed-its-ai-with-customer-data-the-revolt-took-four-days.md", "text": "https://wpnews.pro/news/hubspot-tried-to-feed-its-ai-with-customer-data-the-revolt-took-four-days.txt", "jsonld": "https://wpnews.pro/news/hubspot-tried-to-feed-its-ai-with-customer-data-the-revolt-took-four-days.jsonld"}}