How to Use Transformers.js in a Chrome Extension

Technical guide for developers on integrating Transformers.js into a Chrome extension under Manifest V3 constraints. It details a three-part architecture using a background service worker to host AI models, a side panel for chat UI, and a content script for page-level actions, with the background acting as the central coordinator. The guide also covers the typed messaging contract used for communication between these components and practical considerations for model loading and runtime management.

How to Use Transformers.js in a Chrome Extension While building it, we ran into several practical observations about Manifest V3 runtimes, model loading, and messaging that are worth sharing. Who this is for This guide is for developers who want to run local AI features in a Chrome extension with Transformers.js under Manifest V3 constraints. By the end, you will have the same architecture used in this project: a background service worker that hosts models, a side panel chat UI, and a content script for page-level actions. What we will build In this guide, we will recreate the core architecture of Transformers.js Gemma 4 Browser Assistant, using the published extension as a reference and the open-source codebase as the implementation map. - Live extension: Chrome Web Store - Source code: github.com/nico-martin/gemma4-browser-extension - End result: a background-hosted Transformers.js engine, a side panel chat UI, and a content script for page extraction and highlighting. 1 Chrome extension architecture MV3 Before diving in, a quick scope note: I will not go deep on the React UI layer or Vite build configuration. The focus here is the high-level architecture decisions: what runs in each Chrome runtime and how those pieces are orchestrated. If Manifest V3 is new to you, read this short overview first: What is Manifest V3?. 1.1 Runtime contexts and entry points In MV3, your architecture starts in public/manifest.json . This project defines three entry points: background.service worker = background.js , built fromsrc/background/background.ts .side panel.default path = sidebar.html , built fromsrc/sidebar/index.html .content scripts .js = content.js withmatches: http s :// / andrun at: document idle , built fromsrc/content/content.ts . The background service worker also handles chrome.action.onClicked to open the side panel for the active tab. Related entry point to know: a popup can be defined with action.default popup and works well for quick actions. This project uses a side panel for persistent chat, but the orchestration pattern is the same. 1.2 What runs where The key design decision is to keep heavy orchestration in the background and keep UI/page logic thin. - Background src/background/background.ts is the control plane: agent lifecycle, model initialization, tool execution, and shared services like feature extraction. - Side panel src/sidebar/ is the interaction layer: chat input/output, streaming updates, and setup controls. - Content script src/content/content.ts is the page bridge: DOM extraction and highlight actions. One practical consequence of this division is that the conversation history also lives in background Agent.chatMessages : the UI sends events like AGENT GENERATE TEXT , background appends the message, runs inference, then emits MESSAGES UPDATE back to the side panel. This split avoids duplicate model loads, keeps the UI responsive, and respects Chrome's security boundaries around DOM access. 1.3 Messaging contract Once runtimes are separated, messaging becomes the backbone. In this project, all messages are typed through enums in src/shared/types.ts . - Side panel - background BackgroundTasks :CHECK MODELS ,INITIALIZE MODELS AGENT INITIALIZE ,AGENT GENERATE TEXT ,AGENT GET MESSAGES ,AGENT CLEAR EXTRACT FEATURES - Background - side panel BackgroundMessages :DOWNLOAD PROGRESS ,MESSAGES UPDATE - Background - content ContentTasks :EXTRACT PAGE DATA ,HIGHLIGHT ELEMENTS ,CLEAR HIGHLIGHTS The orchestration rule is simple: the background is the single coordinator; side panel and content script are specialized workers that request actions and render results. Typical request flow: - Side panel sends AGENT GENERATE TEXT . - Background appends to Agent.chatMessages and runs model/tool steps. - Background emits MESSAGES UPDATE . - Side panel re-renders from the updated message list. 2 Transformers.js integration details 2.1 Models and responsibilities In src/shared/constants.ts , this extension uses two model roles: - TextGeneration / LLM: onnx-community/gemma-4-E2B-it-ONNX text-generation ,q4f16 - VectorEmbeddings: onnx-community/all-MiniLM-L6-v2-ONNX feature-extraction ,fp32 The split is intentional: Gemma 4 handles reasoning/tool decisions, while MiniLM generates vector embeddings for the semantic similarity search in ask website and find history . 2.2 Where inference runs All inference runs in background src/background/background.ts : - text generation via pipeline "text-generation", ... with consistent KV Caching enabled by our newDynamicCache class - embeddings via pipeline "feature-extraction", ... plus vector normalization This gives a single model host for all tabs/sessions, avoids duplicate memory usage, and keeps the side panel UI responsive. Because models are loaded from the background service worker, artifacts are cached under the extension origin chrome-extension://<extension-id rather than per-website origins, which gives one shared cache for the whole extension install. MV3 lifecycle note: service workers can be suspended and restarted, so model runtime state should be treated as recoverable and re-initialized when needed. 2.3 Download and cache lifecycle The model lifecycle is explicit: CHECK MODELS inspects what is already cached and estimates remaining download size.INITIALIZE MODELS downloads/initializes models and emitsDOWNLOAD PROGRESS to the UI.- Long-lived instances are reused after setup: - generation pipeline in src/background/agent/Agent.ts - embedding pipeline in src/background/utils/FeatureExtractor.ts - generation pipeline in Permissions and privacy are part of the architecture, not a checkbox at the end. In this project, public/manifest.json asks for sidePanel , storage , scripting , and tabs , plus host permissions for http s :// / : sidePanel : required to open and control the side panel UX.storage : required to persist tool/settings state across sessions.tabs +scripting : required for tab-aware tools and page-level actions.host permissions onhttp s :// / : required because content extraction/highlighting is designed to work on arbitrary websites. Why keep this narrow: permissions define user trust and Chrome Web Store review risk. Request only what your features actually need, and state clearly that inference runs locally in the extension runtime so users understand where their data is processed. 3 Agent and tool execution loop 3.1 Tool-calling basics why this layer exists Before the execution loop, it helps to understand how model tool calling works the basis for any agentic workflow . You pass messages plus a tool schema name , description , and parameters , and Transformers.js formats the actual prompt from those inputs using the model's chat template. Because chat templates are model-specific, the exact tool-call format depends on the model you use. With Gemma-4-style templates, the model emits a special tool-call token block when it decides to call one. import { pipeline } from "@huggingface/transformers"; const generator = await pipeline "text-generation", "onnx-community/gemma-4-E2B-it-ONNX", { dtype: "q4f16", device: "webgpu", }, ; const messages = { role: "user", content: "What's the weather in Bern?" } ; const output = await generator messages, { max new tokens: 128, do sample: false, tools: { type: "function", function: { name: "getWeather", description: "Get the weather in a location", parameters: { type: "object", properties: { location: { type: "string", description: "The location to get the weather for", }, }, required: "location" , }, }, }, , } ; At generation time, the model can emit output like: <|tool call call:getWeather{location:<|"| Bern<|"| }<tool call| That is exactly why this project has a normalization layer webMcp and a parser extractToolCalls : model output must be converted into deterministic tool executions. 3.2 Tool interface in this project src/background/agent/webMcp.tsx normalizes extension tools into a model-friendly shape: name ,description ,inputSchema ,execute Example tools include get open tabs , go to tab , open url , close tab , find history , ask website , and highlight website element . 3.3 Loop design Agent.runAgent The core design choice here is to separate internal model messages from UI-facing chat messages: - Internal model transcript messages : system/user/tool/assistant turns used for messages ingenerator ... . - UI transcript chatMessages : what the user sees, including streamed assistant text plus tool execution metadata tools and performance metrics. Execution flow: - Add user input to chatMessages , create a placeholder assistant message, and stream tokens. - Parse streamed/final model output with extractToolCalls.ts into{ message, toolCalls } . - Keep the user-visible assistant message as plain text, while tool calls execute in background. - Append tool results to the assistant tool metadata and feed results back as the next prompt turn. - Repeat until no tool calls remain, then finalize assistant content + metrics. This keeps user communication clean while preserving a deterministic tool loop in the background. 4 Data boundaries and persistence State placement is another architectural decision that matters a lot in MV3. In this implementation, state is split by lifecycle and access pattern: - Conversation state: background memory Agent.chatMessages for fast turn-by-turn orchestration. - Tool preferences: chrome.storage.local so settings persist across sessions. - Semantic history vectors: IndexedDB VectorHistoryDB for larger local retrieval data. - Extracted page content: background cache WebsiteContentManager keyed by active URL. As described in section 1.2, keeping conversation history in background gives one canonical state across UI updates. This keeps short-lived state in memory, durable settings in extension storage, and heavy retrieval data in a local database. 5 Build and packaging notes You do not need a complex build setup, but MV3 does require predictable outputs for each runtime. - Multi-entry build in vite.config.ts : - Ensure manifest-aligned output names/paths sidebar.html ,background.js ,content.js . - Keep the content script as a self-contained output to avoid runtime chunk-loading issues. The goal is simple: one artifact per Chrome entry point, in the exact place public/manifest.json expects. Final takeaway The architecture choice that unlocks this whole project is clear separation of concerns: background owns orchestration and model execution, UI surfaces stay thin, and content scripts handle page access. This project uses a side panel, but the same approach works for other setups: - Popup-first assistant: use action.default popup for quick interactions, with background owning conversation state and model execution. - Side-panel copilot: keep long-running conversations in a persistent panel while background handles tool loops and caching. - Per-tab agents: keep one agent state per tabId in background when each tab should have its own context. - Hybrid UI popup + side panel + options page : all UI entry points talk to the same background coordinator and reuse the same message contracts. The practical rule is simple: decide where state lives global , tabId , or site-scoped , keep that state and the model inference in background basically as background services , and let UI/content runtimes act as focused clients.