# How I Cut My LLM API Costs by 70% Without Touching My Code

> Source: <https://dev.to/shadie_ai/how-i-cut-my-llm-api-costs-by-70-without-touching-my-code-l7g>
> Published: 2026-06-16 00:55:25+00:00

I was staring at my AWS bill, and my stomach dropped. $214 for AI API calls last month. That's more than my hosting, my database, my entire infrastructure combined. And I wasn't even doing anything crazy—just a handful of LLM calls per request in a side project that gets maybe 500 users a day.

The worst part? I knew I was overpaying, but I felt stuck. The code was working. The responses were good. Rewriting everything to swap providers or add caching felt like months of work I didn't have.

So I did what any lazy engineer would do: I looked for a shortcut. And what I found blew my mind. I cut my API costs by 70% in an afternoon—without changing a single line of my application code. Here's exactly how.

When I started building my AI-powered app, I went with the obvious choice: OpenAI. It worked out of the box, the API was clean, and the results were solid. But after a few months, the bills started creeping up. $50, then $100, then $200. I was running GPT-4 for most calls because I wanted quality, but every response cost me roughly $0.03 to $0.06 depending on length. Multiply that by hundreds of calls a day, and it adds up fast.

I briefly considered switching to a cheaper model like Claude Haiku or Gemini Flash, but that meant updating my code, changing prompt formats, and testing everything again. Not to mention, different models have different strengths—I didn't want to lose quality on complex tasks.

The problem wasn't my code. It was my API routing.

Instead of swapping models in my app, I built a thin proxy layer that sits between my code and the LLM providers. This proxy decides which model to call based on the request's complexity, the time of day, and the user's needs—all without my app knowing.

Here's the core idea: instead of always calling GPT-4, I let the proxy route simple requests to cheaper models (like Claude Haiku or Gemini Flash) and only use expensive ones for tasks that actually need them.

And the best part? I didn't have to change my existing code. The proxy exposes the exact same OpenAI-compatible API. My app just sends `POST /v1/chat/completions`

like it always did. The proxy handles the rest.

I wrote the proxy in Node.js as a simple Express server. Here's the gist:

``` js
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());

// Route requests based on prompt length and complexity
app.post('/v1/chat/completions', async (req, res) => {
  const { model, messages, max_tokens } = req.body;

  // Estimate cost based on input tokens
  const inputTokens = messages.reduce((sum, m) => sum + m.content.length / 4, 0);

  // Define routing logic
  let targetModel;
  if (inputTokens > 1000 || max_tokens > 2000) {
    // Complex/long requests -> use GPT-4o (or Claude 3.5 Sonnet)
    targetModel = 'gpt-4o';
  } else if (inputTokens > 300) {
    // Medium complexity -> use Claude Haiku
    targetModel = 'claude-3-haiku-20240307';
  } else {
    // Simple requests -> use Gemini Flash
    targetModel = 'gemini-1.5-flash';
  }

  // Forward to the real API (using a unified client)
  const response = await callModel(targetModel, messages, max_tokens);
  res.json(response);
});
```

I also added a simple cache: if the same exact prompt was sent within the last hour, return the cached response. That alone cut my calls by 15%.

But the real magic was in the routing. After a few weeks of tweaking thresholds, I found that about 60% of my requests could be handled by Gemini Flash ($0.075 per million tokens input) instead of GPT-4 ($30 per million tokens). That's a 400x price difference.

Before the proxy:

After the proxy (with caching + smart routing):

Wait, that's more than 70%—it's over 90%. But I'm being conservative because some months I have heavier usage. Still, I've been averaging around $60/month for the same workload that used to cost $200.

And the quality? My users haven't noticed a thing. The proxy logs showed that 95% of requests were handled by cheaper models without any drop in response quality. For the few cases where a cheaper model hallucinated or gave a poor answer, I added a fallback: if the output confidence score was low, the proxy would re-route to GPT-4 automatically.

You don't need to build your own proxy from scratch. There are several open-source projects that do exactly this—like LiteLLM, OpenRouter, or a simple Nginx config with custom routing. But my favorite approach is using a hosted service that already aggregates multiple providers with pay-as-you-go pricing.

That's actually how I discovered **shadie-oneapi.com**. It's a unified API that supports dozens of LLMs—OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral, and many more—all under a single OpenAI-compatible endpoint. You just change one URL in your code and you get access to all models, with automatic cost-optimized routing built in. No need to write any proxy logic yourself.

I switched my app to point at their endpoint, and the cost savings kicked in immediately. They handle the routing, caching, and fallback logic. All I did was change the base URL from `https://api.openai.com`

to `https://tai.shadie-oneapi.com/v1`

. My code didn't change. My users didn't change. My wallet did.

The proxy also let me experiment with other optimizations:

`max_tokens`

to the minimum needed. The proxy could analyze the request and set sensible defaults.You don't need to rewrite your app to save money on LLM APIs. You just need a smart layer between your code and the providers. Whether you build it yourself or use a service like shadie-oneapi.com, the principle is the same: **route smart, cache often, and never pay for GPT-4 when Gemini Flash will do**.

I spent one afternoon setting this up, and I've been saving $140+ every month since. That's a return on investment I'll take any day.

If you're currently staring at your own API bill, wondering if there's a better way—there is. And it doesn't require touching your code. Just your API endpoint.