How do you handle “one small change” during client website reviews?

A developer has built Tweak, a tool that lets clients point directly at elements on a live staging site to file change requests, keeping each request attached to the exact page and element as it moves from issue creation through developer assignment and fixing to client approval. The workflow integrates with Cursor and Claude via MCP so coding agents can receive the request context directly, and includes a retainer/request counter for agencies and freelancers to track included client requests. The developer is offering free setup on one real project.

A client finds something that needs changing on a website. Today, that often becomes: Client → screenshot/message → PM/QA → task → developer → clarification → fix → client review. The problem isn't collecting feedback. It's keeping the context connected throughout the entire loop. That's what we're building with Tweak. The client reviews the actual staging site and points directly to the element. From there: Client request → issue created → team assigns it → developer picks it up → Cursor/Claude can receive it through MCP → developer fixes it → client reviews → request is closed. The original request stays attached to the exact page and element throughout the process, so the developer doesn't have to reconstruct what the client meant. We also have a retainer/request counter so agencies and freelancers can define how many client requests are included and see the usage as requests come in. The goal is simple: Don't just collect client feedback. Carry it all the way from the client to the developer and back to client approval without losing context. If you're managing a website project with a client right now, I'll help you set up Tweak for free on one real project so you can try the workflow with your client. How are you handling this workflow today? Try it for free - https://tweak.page/ https://tweak.page/