# Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics: Layer-wise Trajectories of Adversarial Intent in Large Language Models > Source: > Published: 2026-09-15 04:00:00+00:00 arXiv:2609.13534v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We identify \textbf{Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics (HPD)}: for harmful prompts, the projection of the last-token hidden state onto a learned harm direction rises monotonically with transformer depth, whereas benign prompts remain flat or oscillatory. This cross-layer signature reflects harmful intent as a \emph{progressively resolved} semantic property: surface form appears early, while pragmatic intent consolidates later, making the \emph{trajectory shape} more informative than any single-layer snapshot. Moreover, LDA-based harm directions, learned per layer, remain stable across random splits (pairwise cosine similarity $>0.97$), supporting the projection sequence as a reproducible structured signal. Building on HPD, we introduce \textbf{\herald{}} (\textbf{H}armful \textbf{E}ncoding \textbf{R}ecognition via \textbf{A}ctivation \textbf{L}ayer \textbf{D}ynamics). This lightweight input moderator extracts a seven-dimensional feature record, slope, curvature, monotonicity, onset layer, and related statistics from the cross-layer projection sequence and classifies it with a 288-parameter MLP. \herald{} stores one $d$-dimensional direction per layer ($262$\,KB for a 32-layer, $d{=}4096$ model), requires no gradient computation during training, and adds only $2.6{\times}10^{-6}$ prefill FLOPs at inference. Across eight prompt-harmfulness benchmarks and four model families, \herald{} achieves an average F1 of $89.3$ on OLMo2-7B, surpassing all tested guard models on adversarial jailbreak detection ($98.4$ vs.\ $96.9$ F1) and outperforming prior latent-based methods by $2.3$-$4.1$ F1 points on every backbone. Per-instance trajectories provide machine-readable audit records that reveal \emph{when} and \emph{how} harmfulness emerges, offering an interpretability advantage over single-layer approaches.