Grounded Iterative Language Planning: How Parameterized World Models Reduce Hallucination Propagation in LLM Agents

Researchers introduced Grounded Iterative Language Planning (GILP), a hybrid method combining a small parameterized world model with LLM-based agent reasoning, reducing hallucinated-state rates from 0.176 to 0.035 on graph-structured planning benchmarks and boosting success rates from 0.668 to 0.838 with only 22% extra LLM calls.

arXiv:2606.27806v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World models for language agents come in two useful forms. An agent-based world model calls an LLM API and reasons flexibly in language, but its errors appear as hallucinated state changes that are hard to score with ordinary regression losses. A parameterized world model is a trained transition predictor; its errors are easier to measure with quantities such as NodeMSE, delta accuracy, and validity accuracy, but it is usually weaker as a standalone planner. We compare these two families on four graph-structured planning benchmarks and introduce operational hallucination metrics for the agent-based case. The comparison motivates \textbf{Grounded Iterative Language Planning} GILP , which trains only a small parameterized backbone and combines it with API-based agent reasoning. The backbone supplies valid actions, predicted state deltas, risk, and value; the LLM drafts an action and imagined delta; and a consistency gate asks for revision when the two disagree. On real GPT-4o-mini calls, GILP reduces hallucinated-state rate from 0.176 to 0.035. In calibrated simulator ablations, it raises success from 0.668 to 0.838 while adding only ~22% extra LLM calls.