cd /news/ai-products/google-shopping-ads-have-a-reverse-c… · home topics ai-products article
[ARTICLE · art-122377] src=seroundtable.com ↗ pub= topic=ai-products verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Google Shopping Ads Have A Reverse Crocodile Effect With AI Overviews

New data from Smarter Ecommerce's Mike Ryan shows that Google Shopping Ads are experiencing a 'reverse crocodile effect' since AI Overviews launched, with median ad impressions falling from roughly 1.85 million to 1.4 million between mid-2025 and mid-2026, while median click-through rate climbed from 1.20% to nearly 1.55%. Ryan theorizes that Google serves AI Overviews preferentially for lower-probability queries to preserve revenue, causing CTR to climb due to fewer impressions and higher click propensity.

read1 min views1 publishedSep 7, 2026
Google Shopping Ads Have A Reverse Crocodile Effect With AI Overviews
Image: Seroundtable (auto-discovered)

Since Google added AI Overviews to Google Search, many of us have been experiencing what some call the crocodile effect, also known as the great decoupling. But according to new data, the opposite may be happening with Google Shopping Ads.

Mike Ryan from Smarter Ecommerce posted new data that shows how Shopping Ads seem to be getting fewer impressions and more clicks, as a click-through rate percentage. He wrote on LinkedIn saying, "Here's an odd one. Ever since AIOs launched, publishers have been gaining impressions and losing clicks: the dreaded SEO "crocodile effect." For Shopping ads, it's the opposite. But why?"

You can call this the "reverse crocodile effect" in Google Shopping ads, where median ad impressions steadily decline while median click-through rate (CTR) steadily increases following the expansion of AI Overviews (AIOs).

This includes 175 billion impressions, so it is a lot of data. And it shows that between mid-2025 and mid-2026, median Shopping ad impressions fell from roughly 1.85 million to 1.4 million, while median click through rate climbed from 1.20% to nearly 1.55%.

Here is that chart:

Why is this happening? Mike posted his theory, he wrote:

Google checks the predicted CTR of a given query and serves AIOs preferentially for lower-probability queries in order to preserve revenue. Thus CTR climbs partly due to a shrinking denominator (fewer impressions) and partly due to selection/pruning (higher click propensity).

If true, I'd view this as a bridging strategy. They'll shift the balance from more "either/or" experiences toward more "both/and" experiences. This will particularly as Google launches AI-native formats with higher predicted CTR, and scales the presence of Shopping ads in AIOs. What do you think?

Forum discussion at LinkedIn.

── more in #ai-products 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @google 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/google-shopping-ads-…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-09-07 ·