Google challenges EU orders to open up to AI, search engine rivals

Google filed challenges on Monday (Sep 28) at the Luxembourg-based General Court against two EU antitrust orders issued in July under the Digital Markets Act that would require it to give AI rivals such as OpenAI access to services available to its Gemini AI model and give search engine competitors access to its search data, with the changes set to take effect in 2027. Google senior director of competition Oliver Bethell said the decisions would force the company to "share people's private search history without sufficient anonymisation and weaken vital security protections on Android," while the European Commission said the measures contain robust privacy and security safeguards and DuckDuckGo backed the EU watchdog, saying "the only thing an appeal buys Google is time.

Google challenges EU orders to open up to AI, search engine rivals It argues that compliance measures to support competition will undermine user privacy and security BRUSSELS Alphabet’s Google has challenged two EU orders requiring it to help artificial intelligence rivals such as OpenAI access its services, and search engine competitors access its search data, saying these would undermine privacy safeguards and cause irreversible harm to European users. EU antitrust regulators ordered the US tech giant in July to help online search rivals and AI developers use services available to its Gemini AI model under rules known as the Digital Markets Act DMA , which is aimed at reining in Big Tech. The challenges escalate a clash between Google and EU regulators over the scope of the DMA, with the company arguing that compliance measures designed to open up competition would come at the cost of user privacy and security. The changes will kick in in 2027. Google filed its challenges to the Luxembourg-based General Court, Europe’s second-highest court, on Monday Sep 28 . “We are appealing decisions that will force us to share people’s private search history without sufficient anonymisation and weaken vital security protections on Android,” Google’s senior director of competition, Oliver Bethell, said in a statement. “People use Search for their most personal questions – from medical worries to close relationships – and mandating we share these personal queries without adequate safeguards would cause irreversible harm to user privacy,” he said. The European Commission, which enforces the DMA, has said the two measures contain robust safeguards protecting the privacy of users, device integrity and security. DuckDuckGo, a US-based internet privacy company known for its search engine that does not track users’ search history or personal data, backed the EU watchdog. “The anonymisation framework is robust and no amount of manufactured doubt changes that. The only thing an appeal buys Google is time,” a DuckDuckGo spokesperson said. REUTERS Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free. Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services