David Greene’s claims are based on Google’s NotebookLM AI podcasting product’s output, generating his voice for profit, rather than on copying his voice as an input, the US District Court for the Northern District of California said. The Copyright Act only preempts claims that fall within the subject matter of copyright, and Greene didn’t claim that any tangible copyrighted expression was reproduced, the court said.
The opinion by ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading: #
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
source & further reading
news.bloomberglaw.com — original article