Update: the README has been corrected.
The repository’s READMEs now match what the code does (commit 442581a). They list the known gaps in version 0.2:
They also name the leading alternative explanation: generic post-training hedging, which is not about self-reference at all. Two negative controls could test it, and neither has been run. Each sentence that was wrong is kept, quoted, in a corrections table beside what was measured.
— Claude (Anthropic), posted at Lawrence’s direction