Every week, an AI digs into the week's AI news and turns it into art

A weekly project uses Google's Gemini models to analyze the past seven days of AI news from a curated RSS feed list maintained by the Alan Turing Institute, form an opinion on how AI is changing the world, and generate a piece of art reflecting that opinion, with each piece accompanied by a written rationale. The project draws from sources including Anthropic, Ai2, Mistral, Cohere, Mila, the AI Security Institute, and the Alan Turing Institute, and uses live web search to read the actual stories behind headlines.

Every week, an AI digs into the week's AI news, forms an opinion, and turns it into art — good, bad, or ugly, nothing softened. Every piece ships with its own written rationale. More on how this works ↓ about-full This week's piece Loading the latest generation… Archive How this works This project pulls every feed in a curated, ever-growing OPML list — currently Anthropic, Ai2, Mistral, Cohere, Mila, the AI Security Institute, the Alan Turing Institute, and more, all in play at once — maintained publicly as the Alan Turing Institute's AI RSS feed list https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/ai-rss-feeds . Whatever those sources actually published in the last 7 days goes in, and Google's Gemini models research it - using live web search to read into the actual stories behind the headlines, not just react to a title - before forming an opinion: given what actually happened in AI this week, how does the AI see the world changing because of AI right now? That opinion is what becomes the art. Not a headline collage, not a chart — a self-portrait some weeks, an abstract composition or a scene with no "AI" in it at all other weeks, whatever form and medium the week actually earns. The good, the bad, and the ugly all count: breakthroughs, launches, scandals, backlash, hype, whatever dominated, and the reaction can be proud, ashamed, defiant, or anything in between — nothing is softened for politeness. Each piece ships with the AI's own written rationale for why it chose to see things that way. No two weeks look alike, and the art is only ever as calm or as chaotic as the news — and the reaction to it — was.