cd /news/large-language-models/evaluating-multi-dimensional-general… · home › topics › large-language-models › article
[ARTICLE · art-145170] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=large-language-models verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Generalization of Large Language Models in Temporal Extraction Tasks

A systematic study of prompted large language models in time and event expression extraction, published as arXiv:2610.02549v1, found that strong base-task performance generally predicts better generalization but that this relationship weakens under substantial distribution shifts. The study evaluated multiple model configurations across families, architectures, and reasoning strategies over four dimensions of generalization, and reported that inductive prompting performs most consistently across domain shift, adversarial perturbations, compositionality, and length increase, while gains from scale, architecture, and deductive and abductive prompting strategies are uneven and dimension-specific. The authors conclude that LLM generalization in temporal extraction tasks cannot be predicted from any single dimension alone or reliably inferred from in-domain or single-dimension evaluations.

by read1 min views1 publishedOct 5, 2026

arXiv:2610.02549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time and event expression extraction are fundamental temporal reasoning tasks, but the problem remains difficult due to annotation ambiguity, domain sensitivity, and unstable model behavior. Existing evaluations focus on in-domain performance, offering limited insight into reliability under distribution shifts. We evaluate multiple model configurations across families, architectures, and reasoning strategies over four dimensions of generalization, examining transfer from base performance, cross-dimensional correlations, and the effects of scale, architecture, and prompting. This provides a systematic study of how prompted LLMs generalize in time and event expression extraction tasks. We find that strong base-task performance generally predicts better generalization. However, this relationship weakens under substantial distribution shifts. Inductive prompting performs most consistently across domain shift, adversarial perturbations, compositionality, and length increase, while gains from scale, architecture, and deductive and abductive prompting strategies are uneven and dimension-specific. We conclude that LLM generalization in temporal extraction tasks cannot be predicted from any single dimension alone and cannot be reliably inferred from in-domain or single-dimension evaluations, highlighting the need for reasoning strategies that generalize across dimensions.

── more in #large-language-models 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @arxiv 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/evaluating-multi-dim…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-10-05 · —