# Equivariant Cellular Sheaves for Molecular Electronic Structure: Bridging Sheaf Cohomology and E(3)-Equivariant Hamiltonian Learning

> Source: <https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23571>
> Published: 2026-08-26 04:00:00+00:00

arXiv:2608.23571v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Equivariant message-passing networks are the standard model for molecular property and interatomic-potential prediction, and recent work predicts the electronic Hamiltonian itself in an E(3)-equivariant way. Separately, topological deep learning has extended graph networks to cellular sheaves. Our central observation is structural: in a localized atomic-orbital basis, the molecular single-particle Hamiltonian, after a constant shift that makes it positive semidefinite, is the Laplacian of a cellular sheaf on a regular cell complex built from the molecule. Making the restriction maps O(3)-steerable two-center kernels from bond geometry recovers the Slater-Koster form as a special case and yields an E(3)- and permutation-equivariant operator. Three consequences follow. First, the zeroth sheaf cohomology H^0 = ker L is a topological invariant equal to the non-bonding (zero-mode) orbitals, recovering the classical alternant non-bonding-orbital count as a lower bound. Second, the Hodge 1-Laplacian lets higher cells (rings) carry cycle and delocalization information through H^1. Third, the model strictly generalizes E(3)-equivariant message-passing networks and CW networks, and inherits the anti-oversmoothing of non-trivial sheaf diffusion. We prove equivariance, expressivity, and cohomological-correspondence results for the Equivariant Cellular Sheaf Networks, and validate them numerically: the Hamiltonian-to-sheaf embedding is exact to machine precision, the cohomology dimension reproduces non-bonding-orbital counts across eleven conjugated molecules, the sheaf Laplacian is O(3)-equivariant to machine precision, and the equivariant model attains lower error and rotation generalization on a directional electronic target. Our contribution is this sheaf-theoretic formalization and its invariants, not equivariant Hamiltonian prediction itself.
