cd /news/artificial-intelligence/drift-aware-llm-routing-with-sparse-… · home topics artificial-intelligence article
[ARTICLE · art-118551] src=machinebrief.com ↗ pub= topic=artificial-intelligence verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Drift-Aware LLM Routing with Sparse Contexts and Shared Budgets

A new arXiv paper (2609.00662v1) introduces Drift-Aware Sparse Routing (DRS), a method for routing requests across multiple language models while respecting compute, latency, memory, and cost budgets under nonstationary conditions. The authors derive regret bounds that degrade gracefully with drift, achieving a stationary rate of O(sqrt(sT/rho)) when drift is zero and an adaptation term of O(T^(2/3)(s/rho)^(1/3)V_T^(1/3)) under drift.

read1 min views1 publishedSep 2, 2026

arXiv:2609.00662v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A multi-model language service must route each request while preserving workload-level budgets for compute, latency, memory, or monetary cost. Two features make this problem materially harder than static model selection. Prompt representations are high dimensional, so only a small subset of embedding directions may predict the incremental value of a model, and both the request mix and the model frontier drift after launches, fine-tunes, quantization changes, and system updates. We formulate nonstationary sparse contextual routing with multiple knapsack constraints and an optional shadow-audit stream that evaluates a small fraction of prompts on several models. We propose Drift-Aware Sparse Routing (DRS). The policy estimates reward and resource use from a rolling audit window, routes using pessimistic reward and optimistic cost estimates, updates resource shadow prices online, and applies a hard meter before commitment. The analysis separates control from statistics. On any event with uniform prediction radii ${\beta_t}$, regret against a paced dynamic fluid benchmark is bounded by the sum of the radii, a capacity-buffer term, and an $O(\sqrt{T})$ pacing term. Under a sparse linear model and bounded drift $V_T$, rolling estimation gives [ \widetilde O\left( T\sqrt{\frac{s}{\rho W}}+WV_T+\sqrt{T} \right), ] where $s$ is sparsity, $\rho$ is the audit rate, and $W$ is the window length. Optimizing $W$ yields the usual stationary $O(\sqrt{sT/\rho})$ rate when $V_T=0$ and a $O(T^{2/3}(s/\rho)^{1/3}V_T^{1/3})$ adaptation term under drift.

── more in #artificial-intelligence 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @arxiv 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/drift-aware-llm-rout…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-09-02 ·