Terminal-Bench 2.1
Compare Ante runs across models on the same Terminal-Bench 2.1 task set, using consistent parameters and verified benchmark results.
| # | Model | Same-model | Agent | Source | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731max | 82.7%±1.79 SE | $68.41 | 38.9 min | #1 same-model | Ante0.preview.71 | |||
Terminal-Bench Reference
For how different models perform on TB 2.1, see Vals AI's Terminal-Bench 2.1 benchmark.
| # | Agent | Model | Accuracy | Run date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude CodeAnthropic | Fable 5xhigh | 83.8%±1.16 SE | Jun 7, 2026 | |
| 2 | CodexOpenAI | GPT-5.5xhigh | 83.2%±1.13 SE | May 1, 2026 | |
| 3 | Terminus 2Terminal-Bench | Fable 5high | 80.5%±1.16 SE | Jun 5, 2026 | |
| 4 | Cursor CLICursor | Grok 4.5high | 79.3%±1.46 SE | Jul 9, 2026 | |
| 5 | Claude CodeAnthropic | Opus 4.8high | 78.9%±1.31 SE | Jul 9, 2026 | |
| 6 | CodexOpenAI | GPT-5.6 Terramax | 78.4%±1.25 SE | Jul 11, 2026 | |
| 7 | Terminus 2Terminal-Bench | GPT-5.5xhigh | 78.0%±1.22 SE | May 1, 2026 | |
| 8 | mini-SWE-agentPrinceton | Muse Spark 1.1xhigh | 76.2%±1.23 SE | Jul 9, 2026 | |
| 9 | CodexOpenAI | GPT-5.6 Lunamax | 75.7%±1.32 SE | Jul 11, 2026 | |
| 10 | Claude CodeAnthropic | Sonnet 5high | 74.6%±1.64 SE | Jul 9, 2026 | |
| 11 | Terminus 2Terminal-Bench | Gemini 3 Prohigh | 73.9%±1.29 SE | May 1, 2026 | |
| 12 | Claude CodeAnthropic | Opus 4.7max | 68.9%±1.41 SE | May 1, 2026 | |
| 13 | Terminus 2Terminal-Bench | Opus 4.7max | 66.1%±1.37 SE | May 1, 2026 | |
| 14 | Gemini CLIGoogle | Gemini 3 Prohigh | 65.8%±1.38 SE | May 1, 2026 | |
| 15 | Gemini CLIGoogle | Gemini 3.1 Prohigh | 65.8%±1.67 SE | May 5, 2026 | |
| 16 | Terminus 2Terminal-Bench | Gemini 3.1 Prohigh | 65.6%±1.65 SE | May 5, 2026 | |
| 17 | Claude CodeAnthropic | GLM-5.1max | 58.6%±1.24 SE | May 1, 2026 |
source & further reading
antigma.ai — original article
Claude Code Cut Their System Prompt by 80%. Does That Work for Small Models Too?