Getting your
Trinity Audioplayer ready...Humboldt County Sheriff William Honsal on Monday detailed what investigators describe as one of the largest animal‑cruelty investigations ever documented on the North Coast, confirming mass graves, bullet‑ridden dogs, and over 600 dog collars that were recovered at Miranda’s Rescue in Fortuna.
The case now spans more than 20 counties and involves state and federal agencies.
RELATED: Dogs sent to Miranda’s Rescue return to Bay Area shelters as investigation continues
“I want to begin by acknowledging the seriousness of this case and the significant public concerns it has generated. The facts that have been uncovered are deeply disturbing. I understand the community’s desire for answers, accountability, and justice,” said Honsal. “On April 22, 2026, two concerned citizens reported allegations of felony animal abuse and potential fraud involving…Miranda’s Rescue. Those citizens have been monitoring activity at Miranda’s Rescue and observed what they believed to be dogs being buried in an open field behind the rescue. Those citizens later entered the property and recovered eight deceased dogs from the burial site. Those animals were turned over to the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office, and a criminal investigation was launched.”
Miranda’s Rescue took in animals under agreements that promised adoption or lifelong sanctuary care. Instead, according to allegations, the rescue accepted placement fees and later allegedly euthanized some of those animals rather than being able to adopt them out or provide a sanctuary for the animals.
A May 1 search warrant led investigators to seize electronics, business records, financial documents, and firearms. A second warrant, executed on June 23, authorized the excavation of suspected burial sites across the property.
“During that operation, investigators seized electronics, business records, financial records, firearms, and other vital evidence,” said Honsal. “Since that time, investigators have reviewed records, analyzed evidence, and contacted animal shelters and rescue organizations throughout California, even outside the state.”
Records reviewed from January 2025 through April 2026 show 918 dogs were transferred or surrendered to Miranda’s Rescue. Only 116 of those dogs were adopted out; 71 were listed as available for adoption; and 45 remain on site, leaving 731 dogs unaccounted for.
“These are the numbers that we know about. We do know that more animals were transferred to that facility than we have documentation for,” said Honsal. “Out of what we know… that leaves 731 dogs unaccounted for.”
Excavation teams uncovered 117 intact canine remains in two deep pits, some buried 12 to 15 feet down. Another area contained 29 skulls and hundreds of bones. Many of the 70 dogs X‑rayed on site showed bullet fragments.
“We arrived on scene. We scraped off the property to use our ground-penetrating radar to report any anomalies in the soil,” said Honsal. “We had a grid pattern to demonstrate the anomalies in the soil and to determine where possibly could be dig sites.”
Tracing dogs to shelters
“Veterinarians on site preliminarily determined that many of the dogs died from gunshot wounds. In total, 91 microchips were recovered from the scene. Six were recovered from the loose dirt area where the bones were discovered,” said Honsal. “That’s where the 29 canine skulls and hundreds of dog bones were discovered.”
RELATED: ‘He gets a new chapter now’: San Jose pit bull returns from rescue accused of killing dogs
Of the microchips found, 85 were linked to the intact dogs. Many trace back to shelters and rescue organizations across California, and former owners may begin receiving calls from investigators in the coming weeks as detectives work to reconstruct each dog’s path to the rescue.
“The dogs were layered. You can tell that there were different times that the various dogs were put in, and according to our timeline, through evidence, it was determined that the dogs were buried here sometime after January. Between January and April 2026,” said Honsal. “70 of the dogs were X-rayed on site, and many of those dogs showed evidence of bullet fragments.”
The sheriff’s office is asking anyone who surrendered a dog to Miranda’s Rescue within the past year to provide microchip numbers, collar descriptions, transfer dates and any adoption paperwork to help match the dogs to their origins.
“Many of those microchips trace back to shelters and rescue facilities throughout the state,” said Honsal. “We’re going to try and link up the microchip data with the previous owners… people could be receiving a phone call from us.”
Primary euthanasia site
Inside a barn, investigators found spent .22‑caliber shell casings, a .22 rifle, blood spatter and 661 dog collars, some with names and license tags still attached. The sheriff’s office believes the barn served as the primary euthanasia site for the nonprofit animal rescue.
“This is also the area where we have evidence to show that the euthanasia occurred … the collars were located at that location,” said Honsal.
Despite the findings, Miranda’s Rescue remains open because California does not license or regulate animal rescues. Honsal called for statewide reform and pointed to a stalled bill that would have required shelters and rescues to report intake and outcome data.
“There’s no current law or specific state permit or license required to operate an animal rescue in California,” said Honsal. “We want to know what the expectation was for the people sending the dogs to Miranda’s Rescue. That’s going to be very important for us to know what the expectation was … what the contract states. Many of these larger agencies do have contracts that say some specific things about how the animal should be cared for, and so we will be looking at that.”
Honsal said that animal control officers visit the property three times a week and that Shannon Miranda has cooperated with the visits and investigation. Honsal said the remaining animals, which include dogs, cats and birds, all appear healthy and have adequate food. Rumors that the rescue had run out of food to feed the animals are false, he said.
“All the animals seem to be healthy at this time … they have plenty of food,” said Honsal.
Federal agencies, including the FBI and USDA, are reviewing potential violations of the Animal Welfare Act and the federal Crush Act. Their investigation runs parallel to the state’s review of possible animal‑cruelty, fraud, and conspiracy charges.
“Our federal partners are active in this case… looking at the Animal Welfare Act, the Crush Act, PACE,” said Honsal. “Shooting an animal in and of itself is not animal cruelty… we have to prove the defendant acted maliciously and intentionally.”
The Animal Welfare Act sets basic federal standards for the care of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and commercial breeding. The Crush Act was specific to creating videos of cruelty, while the 2019 Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act makes the underlying acts of torture a federal crime in cases affecting interstate commerce or federal jurisdiction. The Parity in Animal Cruelty Enforcement Act (PACE) amended the federal Animal Welfare Act, closing legal loopholes by extending federal prohibitions on animal fighting to all U.S. territories, where it was previously legal in some jurisdictions.
Honsal emphasized that shooting a dog is not illegal under California law unless done maliciously, complicating potential cruelty charges. Prosecutors must prove intent, cruelty, or fraud and then present the findings to the Humboldt County prosecutor to see if charges will be brought forward in this investigation.
“We ask the public, please provide information directly to investigators and avoid spreading unverified information that could compromise the investigation. Many people have asked why Miranda’s Rescue has been allowed to continue operating under these allegations. This remains an active criminal investigation,” said Honsal. “There’s no current law or specific state permit or license required to operate an animal rescue in California, so they’re allowed to continue at this time. I do want to say that I do believe that there are several things that need to be changed throughout the state. There needs to be legislation.”
AB 631 would have required shelters and rescues to report basic intake and outcome data for every animal, creating clearer accountability.
California’s larger crisis persists with limited spay‑and‑neuter access, overcrowded shelters, and limited regulations for rescues. Addressing it will take public education, affordable sterilization services, responsible ownership, and renewed statewide investment.
Investigators are now focused on linking the large number of microchips they found in the burial pits, interviewing former owners, reviewing financial records, and coordinating with other agencies in the potential animal cruelty and fraud investigation at the non-profit Miranda’s Rescue.
“Investigators will be spending a significant amount of time working with our state and federal partners to analyze the data, digital evidence, and financial information associated with this case. This includes interviewing witnesses and following up on tips,” said Honsal. “If there is sufficient evidence to support violations of animal cruelty, fraud, conspiracy, or other applicable laws. The case will be submitted to the prosecution team for review and consideration of criminal charges. I understand the public’s cry for justice. I understand the public’s cry for transparency. However, we must balance the public’s right to know with the constitutional and legal rights of everyone involved.”
The Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office is asking the public for information related to this case, including any details about animals transferred to Miranda’s Rescue within the past year. Anyone with information about the case is asked to call the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office tip line at 707-268-2539 or email hso@co.humboldt.ca.us.
Maranda Vargas can be reached at 707-441-0504