cd /news/machine-learning/damage-aware-bandit-pruning-for-visi… · home topics machine-learning article
[ARTICLE · art-125397] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=machine-learning verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Damage-Aware Bandit Pruning for Vision and Language Transformers

A new arXiv paper (2609.05448v1) formulates structured post-training pruning of vision and language transformers as a damage-aware multi-armed bandit problem under a fixed candidate-evaluation budget, masking attention heads and MLP channel groups on calibration batches. Across five seeds on WikiText-2, LAMBADA, and Imagenette with GPT-2, OPT, Pythia, Qwen2.5, SmolLM2, ViT-B/16, DeiT-Tiny, and Swin-Tiny, the bandit methods usually reduced degradation relative to budgeted greedy selection, with 23 of 28 highlighted comparisons having bootstrap confidence intervals excluding zero and 11 paired tests at p < 0.05. The authors note the selected units are functionally zeroed in the original dense checkpoint, so the reported effects represent effective structural suppression rather than physical compression or measured speedup.

by read1 min views1 publishedSep 10, 2026

arXiv:2609.05448v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Structured post-training pruning of transformers requires selecting complete functional units whose suppression causes limited degradation. We formulate structured-unit selection for language and vision transformers as a damage-aware multi-armed bandit problem under a fixed candidate-evaluation budget. Attention heads and MLP channel groups are temporarily masked on calibration batches. Paired damage is the masked loss minus the base loss on the same batch, reducing batch-to-batch variation. A smooth bounded reward drives either a UCB-style policy or fractional-Beta Thompson Sampling, and the final mask is constructed sequentially by adding one unit at each step. The selected units are functionally zeroed in the original dense checkpoint; therefore, the reported parameter effects represent effective structural suppression rather than physical compression or measured speedup. Experiments on WikiText-2, LAMBADA, and Imagenette cover GPT-2, OPT, Pythia, Qwen2.5, SmolLM2, ViT-B/16, DeiT-Tiny, and Swin-Tiny, with comparisons against random, magnitude, static-saliency, and budgeted-greedy selection. Across five seeds, the bandit methods usually reduce degradation relative to budgeted greedy in the paired language-model comparisons. Of 28 comparisons highlighted in the paper, 23 bootstrap confidence intervals exclude zero and 11 paired tests have p < 0.05; six have q < 0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction across the full family of 116 dataset-wise tests. Matched-evaluation results for ViT-B/16 and Swin-Tiny indicate that their gains are not explained solely by a larger candidate-evaluation budget.

── more in #machine-learning 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @arxiv 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/damage-aware-bandit-…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-09-10 ·