cd /news/ai-safety/correcting-learning-based-perception… · home topics ai-safety article
[ARTICLE · art-136631] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=ai-safety verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Correcting Learning-based Perception for Safety

A two-step runtime perception correction strategy preserved safety in 73% of 45 adaptive cruise control scenarios where perception-based control using Yolo and LaneNet had produced safety violations, according to an arXiv paper (arXiv:2609.22108v1). The method characterizes ML state-estimation uncertainty offline via preimages of perception contracts, then applies a runtime risk heuristic to select states for control decisions, and it could not recover the remaining 27% of scenarios where the preimages were not fully conformant. The correction added an average 2.8% increase in completion time in corrected scenarios, which the authors describe as mild interventions rather than overly conservative behavior.

by read1 min views1 publishedSep 22, 2026

arXiv:2609.22108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-enabled perception is important in many autonomous systems. Unlike traditional sensors, the boundary where ML perception does or does not work is poorly characterized. Incorrect perception can lead to unsafe or overtly conservative downstream control actions. In this paper, we propose a two-step strategy for correcting ML-based state estimation. First, an offline computation is used to characterize the uncertainties resulting from the ML module's state estimation, using preimages of perception contracts. Second, at runtime, a risk heuristic is used to choose particular states from the uncertain estimates to drive the control decisions. We perform extensive simulation-based evaluation of this runtime perception correction strategy on different vision-based adaptive cruise controllers (ACC modules), in different weather conditions, and road scenarios. Out of 45 ACC scenarios where the original perception-based control system using Yolo and LaneNet led to safety violations, in 73% of the scenarios, our runtime perception correction preserved safety; our method wouldn't be able to recover 27% of the scenarios where the construction of the preimages of perception contracts is not fully conformant. Further, our runtime perception correction strategy is not overly conservative---on the average only a 2.8% increase in completion time is experienced in the corrected scenarios, with mild interventions.

── more in #ai-safety 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @yolo 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/correcting-learning-…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-09-22 ·