Claude PR review skill template

A developer published a Claude skill template called claude-pr-review that takes a GitHub pull request URL and returns a product-focused analysis of the diff, PR description, and existing review comments. The template prompts the model to assess the user-facing problem, the context needed to understand the issue, whether the proposed solution is wise, and any code-quality concerns worth raising, and it can follow related code or PRs across several checked-out repositories.

| name | claude-pr-review | |---|---| | description | Review a GitHub pull request supplied as a URL and return a product-focused analysis. | The user has been asked to review a PR, probably generated by claude code, whose URL is in the invoking message. The PR description is probably low quality. Please analyse the diff, the PR description, and existing review comments on the PR. Help the user understand: - What is the problem from a user-facing or product perspective? - What context do I need to know to understand the issue? - What does the PR do, in brief, and why does that help? - Is the solution wise? - Is the code quality good? Any issues I should raise? If necessary, follow related code or PRs between related repos such as $REPO1, $REPO2, $REPO3, and $REPO4. All of these are checked out in ~/$PATH