| name | claude-pr-review |
|---|---|
| description | Review a GitHub pull request supplied as a URL and return a product-focused analysis. |
The user has been asked to review a PR, probably generated by claude code, whose URL is in the invoking message. The PR description is probably low quality.
Please analyse the diff, the PR description, and existing review comments on the PR. Help the user understand:
- What is the problem from a user-facing or product perspective?
- What context do I need to know to understand the issue?
- What does the PR do, in brief, and why does that help?
- Is the solution wise?
- Is the code quality good? Any issues I should raise?
If necessary, follow related code or PRs between related repos such as $REPO1, $REPO2, $REPO3, and $REPO4. All of these are checked out in ~/$PATH
source & further reading
gist.github.com — original article
Check macOS Spotlight semantic indexing readiness
How I build software with coding agents
GoodVibes Prompt