Claude Code lets you define your own subagents — Markdown files that give Claude a specialist it can delegate to, with its own system prompt, its own tool access, and its own context window. The mechanism is simple, but most "my subagent doesn't work" problems come from three details the docs mention once and people skim past: the description
field is the router, name
collisions silently drop a file, and one bad tools
entry stops the agent from launching at all.
Here's the whole system, verified against the current docs.
A subagent is one Markdown file with YAML frontmatter:
---
name: code-improver
description: "Scans files and suggests improvements for readability, performance, and best practices. Use after writing or modifying code."
tools: Read, Grep, Glob
model: sonnet
---
You are a code review specialist. When given files, analyze them for
readability, performance, and adherence to best practices. Report
concrete, minimal suggestions with file:line references.
Where you put it decides who gets it:
.claude/agents/
in your project → this project (usually committed, so your team shares it)~/.claude/agents/
→ every project on your machineBoth locations are scanned recursively, so you can organize files into subfolders like agents/review/
. The subfolder path changes nothing about how the agent is identified — identity comes only from the name
field, not the filename or path.
Only name
and description
are required. Everything else is optional.
Claude reads every subagent's description
and decides to delegate when a task matches it. That's the entire routing mechanism. There is no registration step, no config toggle — the quality of your description
is the trigger.
Which means the most common failure is writing a description like a title:
description: Database expert
description: Reviews SQL queries and schema changes for slow patterns,
missing indexes, and migration risks. Use when SQL or migration files change.
The second one works because it describes when to delegate, not just what the agent is. If you want delegation to happen without being asked, say so in the description — phrasing like "use proactively after code changes" is exactly what the official examples do.
You can always bypass routing and invoke one explicitly: "Use the code-improver subagent on the files I just changed."
The full frontmatter list is longer, but these are the ones I reach for:
| Field | What it does |
|---|---|
tools |
|
| Allowlist. Omit it and the agent inherits every tool available to subagents. | |
disallowedTools |
|
| Denylist, subtracted from the inherited or specified list. | |
model |
|
sonnet , opus , haiku , a full model ID, or inherit (the default). |
|
maxTurns |
|
| Hard cap on agentic turns before the subagent stops. | |
skills |
|
| Skills preloaded into the subagent's context at startup — full content, not just the description. | |
memory |
|
user , project , or local — gives the agent persistent memory across sessions. |
|
background |
|
true forces background execution. Left unset, Claude chooses (and current versions default to background). |
|
isolation |
|
worktree runs the agent in a temporary git worktree so its edits can't collide with yours. |
Two sharp edges in tools
: the entries must resolve to real tool names — if none of them do, the subagent fails to launch with an error naming the bad entries. And if you want a Skill preloaded, use the skills
field; listing Skill
in tools
only grants the invocation tool, it doesn't load anything.
One sharp edge in name
: lowercase letters and hyphens, and no :
— colons are reserved for plugin-scoped identifiers like my-plugin:reviewer
. Current versions refuse to load a file whose name contains one, and the only symptom is a line in the debug log.
When multiple subagents share a name, the higher-priority location wins: managed (organization-deployed) definitions beat project definitions, which beat user definitions, which beat plugin agents. Across nested project directories, the definition closest to your working directory wins.
The dangerous case is two files with the same name
under the same .claude/agents/
tree — including subfolders. Claude Code loads only one, chosen by filesystem read order, not by any documented rule. Nothing warns you at runtime; your carefully updated definition may simply not be the one running. /doctor
reports same-directory duplicates, so run it whenever a subagent behaves like an older version of itself.
Also worth knowing: a project or user subagent named Explore
overrides the built-in read-only Explore agent. That's occasionally useful (for example, pinning exploration to a cheaper model with model: haiku
) — and occasionally an accident, when someone names a general agent "explore" and quietly replaces the built-in.
Older writeups tell you to run /agents
for an interactive creation wizard. That wizard is gone in current versions — /agents
now just points you at editing .claude/agents/
directly, or you ask Claude to write the file for you. The file format and locations didn't change, so any existing agent files keep working.
When a subagent isn't being used, this order finds it fastest:
name
anywhere in the tree → run /doctor
.tools
entries resolve?Greps
fails the launch with a zero-tools error.I publish daily practical notes on Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex on Bluesky — @ai-shop.bsky.social. The tested skill and rules packs I maintain live at Rulestack.