Claude Code Multi-Agent Review Workflow: Roles, Worktrees, and Manual Sign-off

BetterToken has published a guide to a multi-agent code review workflow using Claude Code, which separates roles into an Author agent, a Reviewer agent, and a human Decision Maker to prevent mutual hallucination loops and codebase degradation. The workflow uses isolated git worktrees and a structured handoff card, with the human developer performing the final merge. The approach emphasizes strict role separation over full autonomy to maintain code quality and architectural control.

Building fully autonomous "AI agent teams" with automated code merging often introduces subtle architectural defects, circular refactoring loops, and codebase degradation. Two agents running in parallel do not constitute independent ground truth: if the author agent makes a logical error, a reviewer agent operating on similar prompt foundations may easily overlook it. A reliable multi-agent workflow is built not on the illusion of full autonomy, but on strict role separation: a dedicated implementer Author , an independent verifier Reviewer , and a human developer who makes the final merge decision Decision Maker . In an effective AI development workflow, each participant has a closed, well-defined scope of responsibility: | Role | Core Responsibility | Input Artifacts | Output Artifacts | |---|---|---|---| Author Agent | Code implementation, local unit tests | Task description, completion criteria | Git branch, diff, focused test suite | Reviewer Agent | Edge case discovery, regression checking | Git diff, handoff card, verification commands | Structured review checklist Pass/Block | Human Decision Maker | Architectural validation, final merge | Reviewer summary, CI/CD status | Manual merge to main branch | Never run the author and reviewer agents within the same working directory or shared conversation thread. Isolate them across three operational levels: git worktree add ../agent-author -b feat/payment-retry git worktree add ../agent-reviewer feat/payment-retry IMPORTANT API Configuration: Each Claude Code session operates using its own dedicated API credentials configured through OS environment variables. Follow the official setup guide in BetterToken Claude Code Docs . When the author agent completes implementation, it produces a concise handoff card. Raw chat transcripts, secrets, and unverified assumptions are strictly excluded: Handoff Card - Task : Add HTTP 429 retry support in payment client with exponential backoff. - Branch : feat/payment-retry - Changed Files : src/client/http.ts , tests/http-retry.test.ts - Verification Command : npm test -- tests/http-retry.test.ts Passed - Risks & Blockers : Exponential backoff capped at 3 attempts; socket timeout left unchanged. - Next Step : Reviewer agent validates Retry-After header handling. The reviewer agent performs an isolated evaluation: ../agent-reviewer . The engineer performs the final sign-off: main ; git merge feat/payment-retry .This multi-agent pipeline prevents mutual hallucination loops while keeping code quality and architectural ownership firmly under developer control. Originally published on the BetterToken blog. BetterToken provides pay-as-you-go access to AI model APIs through OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic-compatible endpoints — useful if you are wiring Claude Code, Codex, or your own tooling to a custom base URL. See the docs https://docs.bettertoken.ai/?utm source=devto&utm medium=syndication&utm campaign=SEO-103&utm content=claude-code-multi-agent-review-workflow to get started.