Citing China, President Trump doubles down on hands-off approach to AI regulation

President Donald Trump reaffirmed his administration's hands-off approach to AI regulation in a Truth Social post Monday, writing "Whoever wins AI, WINS!" and vowing not to "stifle Growth" as the U.S. leads China and other rivals. Trump said the Department of Justice and other law enforcement bodies "will rein things in if we have to," offering no specifics on enforcement or legal authority, while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Congress that AI labs should not receive liability exemptions and that "the best way to guarantee safety is that the creators are liable for what they build and generate." The stance follows hacks carried out by U.S. commercial frontier models and a voluntary testing regime set up by an earlier executive order that was delayed and altered by industry boosters, later replaced by a non-public pre-release testing agreement with companies including OpenAI and Anthropic.

Citing China, President Trump doubles down on hands-off approach to AI regulation By Derek B. Johnson President Donald Trump continued to defend his administration’s hands-off approach to AI regulation in the wake of hacks carried out by U.S. commercial frontier models that have rattled policymakers and industry veterans and spurred calls for more regulatory oversight. In a Truth Social post https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117309814170246776 Monday, Trump dismissed worries from critics that “AI is going to kill us,” comparing them to complaints from environmentalists about climate change, which he also alleged was a false narrative. He also posited that nothing may matter more than future U.S. dominance of the technology over geopolitical rivals like China. “Whoever wins AI, WINS ” Trump posted. “We are leading now over China, and everyone else, and I’m going to keep it that way I’m not going to stifle Growth, of something that will be bigger than the Industrial Revolution, or the internet, itself.” Trump has previously suggested https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/president-donald-trump-claims-a-strong-and-smart-president-is-the-only-guardrail-ai-artificial-intelligence-needs-risks-regulations-anthropic-ceo-dario-amodei-warning-openai-safety-research that good leadership is the only regulation the U.S. needs for artificial intelligence. He later claimed the Department of Justice was ready to “rein things in” if companies overstepped, but offered no specifics on enforcement, legal authority, or where he would draw that line. “We will be careful, and that’s why we have the Department of Justice, and other Law Enforcement bodies, that will rein things in if we have to, but I will only encourage AI or, SI SUPER INTELLIGENCE ” Trump concluded. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent recently told Congress https://fedscoop.com/treasury-scott-bessent-ai-labs-liability-exemptions/ that private lawsuits could force AI companies to institute better security, saying it’s clear what the government “shouldn’t do on safety is to give these labs a liability exemption, which is what they are asking for.” “The best way to guarantee safety is that the creators are liable for what they build and generate,” Bessent said. Beyond existential fears, critics also argue that inadequate regulation or cybersecurity controls in current AI systems make them impossible https://cyberscoop.com/ai-agent-hacking-apocalypse-cybersecurity/ to fully control or monitor. Recently, former President Barack Obama criticized the argument from Trump administration officials that the free market will naturally push industry toward self-regulation and that “these companies will solve the safety issues because they have every incentive to do so.” “If it turns out to be dangerous, people will just sue them and they’ll be worried about financial liability,” Obama said https://www.wwnytv.com/2026/09/21/obama-says-government-should-act-fast-regulate-ai/ last week in remarks at Colgate University in New York. “That’s not how we treat airlines or drug companies or food companies.” The Trump administration issued an executive order earlier this year https://cyberscoop.com/donald-trump-white-house-ai-executive-order-scaled-back/ that set up a voluntary testing regime for some commercial frontier models, largely at private industry’s discretion. That order was significantly delayed and altered by AI industry boosters to ensure that governmental review did not cause companies to postpone their release timelines for new models. That agreement did not last long before fast-moving events caused the administration to strike another, non-public agreement with frontier AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and others governing pre-release testing for models. But the Trump administration has consistently https://cyberscoop.com/ai-safety-jd-vance-paris-ai-summit-deregulation/ argued that regulation will harm, not help, U.S. innovation and global competitiveness, and the threat of China frequently looms large in those discussions. Experts believe China’s AI models are behind U.S. models at the top of the market, where OpenAI and Anthropic have consistently pushed the frontier limits of model capabilities. But Chinese lower and “middle class” models are often cheaper, more efficient and can even outperform https://cyberscoop.com/mid-tier-ai-models-hacking-threat/ more powerful models because users can dedicate exponentially more tokens for their tasks. The U.S. government has accused https://cyberscoop.com/white-house-accuses-moonshot-ai-anthropic-model-distillation/ Chinese AI companies of conducting widespread, “systematic” distillation of U.S. frontier models, with the implicit encouragement of Beijing. In defending the administration’s approach, David Sacks, co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science & Technology and a top adviser on AI issues, specifically cited the threat from China and other countries that he claimed would not be subject to similar restrictions. “We’re not the only country that has advanced AI labs, and as the president declared…we have to win this AI race,” Sacks told Politico https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-press/2026/05/01/full-transcript-former-white-house-ai-and-crypto-czar-david-sacks-on-the-conversation-with-dasha-burns-00902694 in May, later adding “I think that’s the first thing to recognize is that if somehow we slow down or stop AI development, it doesn’t mean that AI progress is going to stop. It just means it’s going to happen in other countries and specifically China.” Some observers have alleged that despite their larger differences, top leaders in the U.S. and China may view AI similarly at the strategic level, specfically that increased adoption – and risks – of AI are inevitable. Ronan Murphy, director of the tech policy program at the Center for European Policy Analysis, posited that while there may not be a formal agreement between the two countries, “they share views both in Beijing and in Washington, particularly in the White House, of: you have to allow this to happen.” “Clearly there’s a call for regulation from many quarters of AI in the U.S. and elsewhere, but in the White House – and we heard David Sacks talking about it recently – It’s ‘let them cook,’ and the Chinese approach seems to be the same,” said Murphy in a press briefing. “So there might be consensus at that level, if nothing else.”