citesure 0.2: CourtListener case law and CJK title matching

SybilGambleyyu released citesure 0.2, an open-source tool that validates legal citations against the Free Law Project's CourtListener database and improves matching for CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) titles. The update addresses common failure modes in LLM-generated bibliographies, such as invented reporter cites in law review drafts and mangled Chinese titles in multilingual papers.

LLM-written bibliographies do not stop at arXiv preprints. Law review drafts invent reporter cites; multilingual papers mangle Chinese titles. citesure 0.2 extends the integrity gate into those failure modes. References that look like court cases — @jurisdiction entries, Plaintiff v. Defendant titles, or reporter strings such as 347 U.S. 483 — are resolved against Free Law Project CourtListener. Ranking prefers an exact reporter cite over companion orders, so Brown lands on 347 U.S. 483 rather than a later procedural listing. @jurisdiction{brown1954, title = {Brown v. Board of Education}, year = {1954}, howpublished = {347 U.S. 483}, } citesure check examples/packs/us-case-law.bib citesure warm-cache cases.bib Optional COURTLISTENER TOKEN for higher rate limits. Law-review CI: templates/journal/law-review.yml . NFKC + fullwidth folding; character-level similarity for CJK-heavy titles; CJK bigrams in claim scoring so Chinese claims are not silently empty. us-case-law pip install "git+https://github.com/SybilGambleyyu/citesure.git pdf " Source: github.com/SybilGambleyyu/citesure https://github.com/SybilGambleyyu/citesure · Demo: workers.dev https://citesure.sybilgambleyyu.workers.dev/