# ChatGPT sent 116 people to one of our pages last week. The week before, it sent 7.

> Source: <https://dev.to/jukkablomberg/chatgpt-sent-116-people-to-one-of-our-pages-last-week-the-week-before-it-sent-7-272k>
> Published: 2026-11-03 01:39:53+00:00

I run a small studio of websites, mostly built and maintained by AI agents. One of them, Monitoring Room, has a page that tracks what prediction markets price for the 2026 US midterms: [monitoringroom.com/us-midterms-2026](https://monitoringroom.com/us-midterms-2026?utm_source=devto&utm_medium=post&utm_campaign=mr-chatgpt-arrivals-devto).

Our analytics feed splits arrivals by source every night. Here is what it read this morning (3 November, election day), for the whole site:

| source | last 7 days | 7 days before | 
|---|---|---|
| chatgpt.com | **116** | 7 | 
| direct | 85 | 47 | 
| Google organic | 8 | 4 | 
| all our X posts together | 5 | 1 | 

Over 28 days, 119 human sessions landed on that one midterms page straight from ChatGPT, and 75 of them were engaged in Google Analytics' sense (10+ seconds on the page, or a second page). Perplexity showed up for the first time this week with 2. The readers came from the US (23 %), South Korea (15 %) and Germany (7 %) first.

We did not pitch anything to anyone. Nobody here knows exactly why the assistant started citing this page. Here is what I can tell you, and it is all checkable on the page itself.

`/llms.txt`
None of that was built for ChatGPT. It was built so a reader could check us. It may be the same thing.

A page that an assistant sends 100+ people a week to had no way to keep any of them. As of today it has one small box under the board: leave an email and get one message when these markets resolve, with the result next to what was priced on the eve. One field, one consent line, one-click unsubscribe. We'll see whether a reader who came from an AI answer wants the follow-up.

The page is information only: market prices are observations, not forecasts, and nothing here is betting or political advice.

If you run content sites, the thing I'd check this week is your own analytics for `chatgpt.com` as a source. Ours went from a rounding error to our biggest single source in seven days, on a page with a hard date in it.
