cd /news/artificial-intelligence/can-llm-agents-infer-world-models-ev… · home topics artificial-intelligence article
[ARTICLE · art-125340] src=arxiv.org ↗ pub= topic=artificial-intelligence verified=true sentiment=· neutral

Can LLM Agents Infer World Models? Evidence from Agentic Automata Learning

A June 15, 2026 arXiv paper introduces agentic automata learning, a testbed in which tool-calling LLM agents must uncover a hidden deterministic finite automaton (DFA) through membership and equivalence queries to an oracle. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs, the authors find performance drops sharply as DFA size increases, with reasoning models markedly stronger than non-reasoning models but still far less robust and efficient than classic automata-learning algorithms. Trajectory analyses attribute recurring failures to query planning, evidence integration, and hypothesis construction.

read2 min views2 publishedSep 10, 2026
Can LLM Agents Infer World Models? Evidence from Agentic Automata Learning
Image: source
  [Submitted on 15 Jun 2026]


[View PDF](/pdf/2606.16576)

[HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2606.16576v1)

Abstract:We propose agentic automata learning to evaluate the extent to which tool-calling LLM agents can uncover hidden environments through interaction. In our setup, an agent should uncover a hidden deterministic finite automaton (DFA) by interacting with an oracle through (1) membership queries ("Does this string belong to the target language?") and (2) equivalence queries ("Is this the target DFA?"). This yields a scalable testbed with controlled task complexity, measurable interaction efficiency, and strong baselines (classic automata-learning algorithms). Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that performance drops sharply as DFA size increases. Reasoning models are markedly stronger than non-reasoning models, yet trajectory analyses reveal recurring failures in query planning, evidence integration, and hypothesis construction. Overall, our results show that current LLM agents can sometimes perform non-trivial interactive discovery, but remain far less robust and efficient than classic algorithms for the task.

References & Citations

...

Bibliographic Explorer

(What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers

(What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps

(What is Litmaps?) scite Smart Citations

(What are Smart Citations?) alphaXiv

(What is alphaXiv?) CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers

(What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub

(What is DagsHub?) Gotit.pub

(What is GotitPub?) Hugging Face

(What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast

(What is ScienceCast?) Influence Flower

(What are Influence Flowers?) CORE Recommender

(What is CORE?) arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

── more in #artificial-intelligence 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @arxiv 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/can-llm-agents-infer…] indexed:0 read:2min 2026-09-10 ·