Can conference review infrastructure keep up with the increasing volume of NON-SLOP research due to agentic tools? [D]

A discussion post questions whether conference peer-review infrastructure can handle the rising volume of legitimate research produced faster by agentic AI tools, distinguishing this productivity acceleration from low-quality "slop" research. The post cites examples such as iterating on ideas that previously required multiple days of tedious coding now being completed in a few hours, and quick refactoring of LaTeX documents.

AI tools have given us a lot of slop research, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about real productivity acceleration due to AI tools E.g. iterating ideas that would've taken multiple days of tedious coding gets done in a few hours, quick refactoring of latex documents, etc. . Furthermore