A RAG answer can cite a real document and still make an unsupported claim. Retrieval answers “which text was nearby?” Citation verification asks a different question: “does the cited text contain enough evidence for this sentence?”
Start with a deterministic gate before adding another model.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass
class Claim:
text: str
citation_ids: list[str]
required_terms: set[str]
def verify(claim: Claim, sources: dict[str, str]) -> dict:
missing = [cid for cid in claim.citation_ids if cid not in sources]
evidence = " ".join(sources.get(cid, "") for cid in claim.citation_ids).lower()
absent = sorted(term for term in claim.required_terms if term.lower() not in evidence)
return {
"claim": claim.text,
"valid_source_ids": not missing,
"missing_sources": missing,
"missing_terms": absent,
"supported": not missing and not absent,
}
sources = {
"doc-1": "The service retains audit logs for 30 days.",
"doc-2": "Enterprise plans can export logs as JSON."
}
claim = Claim(
"All plans retain exportable audit logs for 90 days.",
["doc-1", "doc-2"],
{"all plans", "90 days"},
)
print(verify(claim, sources))
Expected result:
... 'missing_terms': ['90 days', 'all plans'], 'supported': False}
This is intentionally not semantic reasoning. It catches missing references and obvious term mismatches while remaining easy to inspect. That makes it a useful first test and a poor final verifier.
30
and thirty
can be compared.Measure precision and recall separately. A gate that blocks every answer has perfect recall for bad answers and no product value. A gate that approves everything is fast but meaningless.
The public MonkeyCode repository describes AI task and project-requirement workflows. Citation gates can be useful anywhere an assistant summarizes repository requirements or task evidence, but this exercise does not test MonkeyCode or describe its implementation.
Disclosure: I contribute to the MonkeyCode project. The repository description is public; this Python lesson is independent.
After this exercise, the key lesson should be clear: a citation is an address, not proof. Verification needs its own explicit step.