Benchmarking Confidential Computing Performance on Nvidia Blackwell GPUs

A new arXiv paper (submitted 27 Aug 2026) benchmarks confidential computing on NVIDIA B200 GPUs using Intel TDX and NVIDIA Confidential Computing, finding that correctly configured confidential inference incurs only 1-3% throughput overhead, while stock stacks suffer 30-40% penalties from avoidable configurations. The study localizes costs to encrypted boundaries and provides a microbenchmark to predict serving penalties, with GPU compute, energy draw, and memory capacity unaffected.

Computer Science Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing Submitted on 27 Aug 2026 Title:Benchmarking Confidential Computing Performance on NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs View PDF /pdf/2608.26575 HTML experimental https://arxiv.org/html/2608.26575v1 Abstract:This paper measures the performance impact of running large language model inference and training inside a Trusted Execution Environment TEE on NVIDIA B200 GPUs, using Intel Trust Domain Extensions TDX confidential VMs together with NVIDIA Confidential Computing CC on Blackwell GPUs. The performance impact is derived from paired confidential versus non-confidential runs on a single physical host where the only variable is the GPU CC bit and the TDX guest object in the VM launch. The main result is that confidential inference on Blackwell achieves low single-digit throughput overhead when the stack is configured correctly, at about 1-3%. Stock inference stacks incur 30 to 40% penalties due to avoidable configurations rather than the achievable operating point. The cost is not fully represented by a single number because it is governed by two independent axes, a fixed per-host-operation cost that amortizes as batch size grows and a per-NVLink-traffic cost that tracks the share of the step spent in encrypted collectives, and which of the two dominates is set by the workload and the software. We localize each cost to a specific encrypted boundary, give a microbenchmark that predicts the serving penalty to within a submission count, and end with concrete deployment guidance. GPU compute, energy draw, and usable memory capacity are unaffected by CC. References & Citations Loading... Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer What is the Explorer? https://info.arxiv.org/labs/showcase.html arxiv-bibliographic-explorer Connected Papers What is Connected Papers? https://www.connectedpapers.com/about Litmaps What is Litmaps? https://www.litmaps.co/ scite Smart Citations What are Smart Citations? https://www.scite.ai/ Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv What is alphaXiv? https://alphaxiv.org/ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers What is CatalyzeX? https://www.catalyzex.com DagsHub What is DagsHub? https://dagshub.com/ Gotit.pub What is GotitPub? http://gotit.pub/faq Hugging Face What is Huggingface? https://huggingface.co/huggingface ScienceCast What is ScienceCast? https://sciencecast.org/welcome Demos Recommenders and Search Tools Influence Flower What are Influence Flowers? https://influencemap.cmlab.dev/ CORE Recommender What is CORE? https://core.ac.uk/services/recommender arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html .